Songwriting Forum - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Announcements, Suggestions, & Feedback
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: The Songwriting Forums Fate...
Keep It 6 33.33%
Burn it 12 66.67%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2009, 11:59 PM   #31 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Post counts don't mean anything when it comes to quality. And you certainly don't need 300 posts to see if someone is going to be a good poster or not. In fact you don't even need half that amount. I'm a moderator & I only average 7 posts a day. It would take me weeks to get 300.

It seems everytime an issue comes up anywhere on the forum restricting access by post count is constantly mentioned as a solution. All it does is make people feel excluded or make them post crap to make up the numbers.

The only reason why we have the 15 post rule for posting links is so that it makes spammers easier to spot and I feel thats the only posting limit we should have here. I'm not even for the 50 post rule that's in place now for that forum , but i'm just one mod of many and it isn't my sole decision.

If it was up to me I would have one thread for each member & make them post everything in that thread. If we get any trouble or it becomes apparent that they have no interest in contributing to any other parts of the forum that thread gets closed & they're not allowed another.

That way you have one cleaned up Songwriting forum and not a single post restriction in sight anywhere.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 12:24 AM   #32 (permalink)
Souls of Sound Sailors
 
Schizotypic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
If it was up to me I would have one thread for each member & make them post everything in that thread. If we get any trouble or it becomes apparent that they have no interest in contributing to any other parts of the forum that thread gets closed & they're not allowed another.

That way you have one cleaned up Songwriting forum and not a single post restriction in sight anywhere.
Oh wow, that's a really, really good idea. If it was like a members journal or something, and you had to ask for moderator permission to start one. That would be awesome, I could go to the people's poems who I liked. What the heck is the counterargument to that?
Schizotypic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 12:53 AM   #33 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
If it was up to me I would have one thread for each member & make them post everything in that thread. If we get any trouble or it becomes apparent that they have no interest in contributing to any other parts of the forum that thread gets closed & they're not allowed another.
That's a better idea than what's been proposed so far.
Gets my vote.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 10:53 AM   #34 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: lorain,ohio
Posts: 909
Default

I say you just unleash the wrath of a pissed off Urban Hatemonger on the forum.
coryallen2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 06:28 PM   #35 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default The value of the songwriting section

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
I agree with those, such as Crowe, who feel eliminating the songwriting section of MB would be a loss to a community that banters about music (all of which had to be created by someone through some process before getting to the point of being able to be critiqued as a song).

While writing songs .com website is an excellent website for songwriters, what it appears to lack is exactly what MB has to offer: a section that describes different genres of music and is visited by people who may spend more time listening to music than trying to create it, and thus are knowledgeable about how lyrics or songs-in-the-works might sound similar to previously created songs or genres. This knowledge could potentially be very helpful to those who are trying to write songs.

I also feel it is unrealistic to expect that people who find the song creation process especially interesting to be as well-versed in bantering about existing songs. The reason: time constraints. If it takes someone 10 hours of free time to create a song during a week, those are 10 hours that are (probably) not spent listening to all the wonderful music others have created. While this may not be true for everyone who likes to make music, it certainly is for me, and so while I try to listen to others' music, if I were to do that as much as I would like then I'd have no time to work on my own projects...which, of course, might delight a few people:-).

Finally, responding to those who say much in the songwriting section is "worthless" and should be scrapped, I disagree with the view that there is some universal system for deciding whether particular song lyrics are "good" or "bad." What I love about art is that relativism is supreme in this area of human creation: what may be bad to one person may be delightful to another, and neither is incorrect because it is a matter of opinion.

Jansoon wrote:
Quote:
I'd say get rid of it but I'm afraid that would just result in people posting bad teen angst poetry in other places. At least this way it's contained.
If a teenager is writing about wanting to commit suicide or about other strong feelings common to many going through that period of life (when people generally are trying to get to know themselves better as well as their views of how they fit into the universe), there may be some reader to whom those lyrics speak profoundly as if they were her or his own.

While lyrics can be critiqued in a wide variety of ways (structure, intent, awareness of historic poetry/song trends, use of poetic techniques), whether people like them or not seems less important to me than helping the writer decide if the song is conveying what the writer wants and in the way s/he wants. Also, I actually think it is almost more interesting to figure out what sort of songs people feel are "crap," because these songs reveal something interesting about the reader and the society. For example, are simple lyrics that are very emotional considered too effusive to a culture that may value stoicism? Or are lyrics that appear to lack originality (in images or metaphors used) considered "boring" because the culture values "individualism"?

I enjoy the songwriter section because it is a privilege to see how people who write songs are feeling/thinking...and this section allows you to talk to them about it, which is nearly impossible to do with any of the songwriters whose works have become popular and are bantered about in the upper music banter section.
--Erica

Last edited by VEGANGELICA; 07-08-2009 at 07:47 AM.
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 01:03 PM   #36 (permalink)
myspace.com/stonebirdies
 
Stone Birds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Conor Oberst Was/is Here
Posts: 1,401
Default

you guys should look at other song-writing sub-forums all over the internet, ours is five star compared to most of them.
__________________
//\\//\\/\\/\/\/\\\\\\\\///\/\/\/\/\\////\/\\\\\///\V

//\\//\\/\\/\/\/\\\\\\\\///\/\/\/\/\\////\/\\\\\///\V

[Link removed by mod, no advertising] ... Damn those mods are always gettin ya :)
Stone Birds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 01:28 PM   #37 (permalink)
sleepe
 
Double X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
tl;dr
But seriously, I was talking about some of the people that don't contribute anything else to the forum. When someone like Cardboard Adolescent or Shisedo Red posts (quick glance at the forum)...I actually read it because I have a little background to who they are, instead of some hobo who walks in and wants us to rate their lyrics.
Double X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 10:24 AM   #38 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
But seriously, I was talking about some of the people that don't contribute anything else to the forum. When someone like Cardboard Adolescent or Shisedo Red posts (quick glance at the forum)...I actually read it because I have a little background to who they are, instead of some hobo who walks in and wants us to rate their lyrics.
Hi, Double X,

You are not the first and probably will not be the last to say "tl dr" in response to one of my posts, hehe! I've decided that I am not really a "banterer"; I am more of a "discuss-in-depther."

Here's the part of my previous post that relates to what you say above:

I feel it is unrealistic to expect that people who find the song creation process especially interesting will be able to post often about existing songs. The reason: time constraints. If it takes someone 10 hours of free time to create a song during a week, those are 10 hours that are (probably) not spent listening to all the wonderful music others have created and bantering about them.

I don't mind if someone is focusing on songwriting and contributes to the community only through that section.

--Erica
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.