DwnWthVwls |
05-29-2018 05:39 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
(Post 1955916)
Yes.
|
So we agree... and knowing nothing about Roseanne, it is correct to assume the joke is NOT racist. That's how the null hypothesis works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor
(Post 1955908)
I've said it before, but I could make an alt and just pick basic wishy washy positions on everything and as long as I typed in a dry enough manner it would be seen as intellectual
|
I don't think you can. You have a very neanderthal idea of what logical reasoning is.. Your counter-points almost always belong in the encyclopedia of what not to do in a debate. Fallacy after fallacy, after emotional pleading, after lazy answer, after obliviousness to nuance after whatever.. Like I said, you'll make a wonderful politician, but don't ever join the debate team or tell people youre a polisci academic, cause it'd be an insult to your institution.
|