Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   The Wow I Can't Believe That News Story Thread (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/30710-wow-i-cant-believe-news-story-thread.html)

Exo 11-13-2018 03:20 PM

Admitting you're wrong is the #1 easiest way for me to like somebody(more).

[MERIT] 11-13-2018 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 2015011)
but you're glossing over the part where you said stupid ****

US support for Israel has nothing to do with Zionism

I'm honestly perplexed as to the U.S. / Israel relationship. What does the U.S. get out of it? We fight Israel's wars for them. We give them BILLIONS of dollars so that their government can give its citizens luxuries that U.S. taxpayers don't have. It's COMPLETELY one-sided.

OccultHawk 11-13-2018 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [MERIT] (Post 2015015)
I'm honestly perplexed as to the U.S. / Israel relationship. What does the U.S. get out of it? We fight Israel's wars for them. We give them BILLIONS of dollars so that their government can give its citizens luxuries that U.S. taxpayers don't have. It's COMPLETELY one-sided.

so the return the skyman jew zombie part 3 can have a setting like from Revelation 666

Ninetales 11-13-2018 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [MERIT] (Post 2015007)
Every news article I can find about this CLEARLY states that the DHHS failed to live up to their obligations under The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act Of 1986. DHHS even admitted that they didn't file the reports.

So, please show me the reports so that I can eat some crow and apologize for being wrong, or stop.

I'm literally citing the case and all documents as they were submitted to the courts. Again here's the link. Nowhere in those documents does it say anything about "DHHS admitting to not filing the reports" obligated through the NCVIA 1986 act.

OccultHawk 11-13-2018 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 2015017)
so do some research, learn something

You gettin back in it raw doggy dawg? Any red lumps?

OccultHawk 11-13-2018 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninetales (Post 2015019)
I'm literally citing the case and all documents as they were submitted to the courts. Again here's the link. Nowhere in those documents does it say anything about "DHHS admitting to not filing the reports" obligated through the NCVIA 1986 act.

jonestown was a hoax

IT WAS NOT A MASS SUICIDE LIKE THE WORLD WAS BRAINWASHED INTO BELIEVING

Guyana Guyana Guyana
Guyana Guyana Guyana
Guyana Guyana Guyana
Guyana Guyana Guyana

[MERIT] 11-13-2018 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninetales (Post 2015019)
I'm literally citing the case and all documents as they were submitted to the courts. Again here's the link. Nowhere in those documents does it say anything about "DHHS admitting to not filing the reports" obligated through the NCVIA 1986 act.

So, show me the reports that they submitted to Congress. Should be around 16 of them.

Ninetales 11-13-2018 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [MERIT] (Post 2015032)
So, show me the reports that they submitted to Congress. Should be around 31 of them.

First of all, I'm not sure if those would be public domain - hence the FOIA appeal.

Even if they are this is what the NCVIA says (here if you want to read it)

Within 2 years after December 22, 1987, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate a report describing the actions taken pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding 2-year period.

Which is not the same as the "every two years a report must be transmitted". The reports requested as per the above subpart do not have a strict timeline and are not mandatory for issuance.

The plaintiff issued an FOIA to DHHS for the release of documents explicitly pertaining to §300aa–27 (quoted above) and explicitly located at the establishment this form was sent to the plaintiff. Explicitly is important. This does not mean that no safety reports exist for vaccines.

[MERIT] 11-13-2018 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninetales (Post 2015068)
First of all, I'm not sure if those would be public domain - hence the FOIA appeal.

Even if they are this is what the NCVIA says (here if you want to read it)

Within 2 years after December 22, 1987, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate a report describing the actions taken pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding 2-year period.

Which is not the same as the "every two years a report must be transmitted". The reports requested as per the above subpart do not have a strict timeline and are not mandatory for issuance.

The plaintiff issued an FOIA to DHHS for the release of documents explicitly pertaining to §300aa–27 (quoted above) and explicitly located at the establishment this form was sent to the plaintiff. Explicitly is important. This does not mean that no safety reports exist for vaccines.

Ah, so it's semantics. Thanks for clearing that up.

No one said that no safety reports exist on vaccines, just that reporting regulations weren't being properly followed.

And where were you in the Vaccine Safety thread?

Frownland 11-13-2018 06:00 PM

Hey look, [MERIT] is defending shoddy journalism because it aligns with what he already believes. Everyone look surprised.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.