Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2048693)

Based on what? Statistics from the 80s and 90s that assume they'll continue their immigration rates in perpetuity even though immigration and birth rates have been declining since the 00s? Congrats on being a reactionary white alarmist.

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2048650)

Mexicans would win the race war

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2048650)

Mexicans would win the race, but not on yaks.

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2048695)

Tfw word choice is quite revealing.

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2048694)

Just because I bring something up doesn't mean I'm alarmed about it. White people are having less babies with other whites here in the U.S. and we've seen similar trends in other places too. It's a fact, and as an overall trend it's ideal.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-a...nsus-projects/

Hispanics are the largest minority and have lots of kids. Odds are they'll become the next majority by default. If white people have a problem with that, they should up their sperm counts or something.

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2048737)

I guess if you assume they'll stop declining and stay static long enough for your racial apocalypse fantasies to come to fruition.

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2048692)

I'm saying it doesn't matter who the majority is because they'd all act the same way once in power..which puts you back to square one if that was your big takeaway. Look at any other country in the world where one demographic dominates. Are you going to go lecture China that they should have less Chinese people so more African-expats (or anyone who is born over there that aren't biologically Chinese) can have market share? What does that even look like?

In the case of Hispanics, it wouldn't be worse. It's simply more likely that they'll be the next majority in the U.S. census-wise.