I think they should add 69.

^ Anyone else notice that this link doesn't work? :(

I think it was meant as a joke

Is there an echo in here?

:laughing:

I think it was meant as a joke.

Is this true or is this itself libel?

Nah it's true.

He said so himself. Idk about the child pornography but his site was taken down for spreading con spiracy theories etc.

Nah I remember the child pornography. I mean I don't remember it personally but you know what I mean.

Most of those girls looked like they were around 18 to me.

Milo Yiannopoulos 'more than $2m in debt'

"The far right activist Milo Yiannopoulos was more than $2m in debt during 2018, according to a collection of documents assembled by his former Australian tour promoters and seen by Guardian Australia. Creditors listed in the documents include employees of his company, a wedding venue and his former sponsors, the billionaire Mercer family.

The documents indicate that as of April 2018, Yiannopoulos owed $1.6m to his own company, $400,000 to the Mercers, $153,215 to his former lawyers, $76,574 to former collaborator and Breitbart writer Allum Bokhari, and $20,000 to the luxury jewellery brand Cartier."

I didn't think that Budding Orinthologists was as good as it should've been.

► SpaceX Successfully Launches 64 Satellites Into Orbit


► The Central European University: GEORGE SOROS-Funded University Ousted From Hungary


► Qatar Resigns From OPEC

It got taken down because I violated hella copyrights by giving away digital copies of books for free and talked about things that people are afraid to discuss, like zionism and Israeli war crimes. It was up for half a decade and had nearly half a million hits. Hundreds of videos, thousands of PDF's and around a hundred original articles, one of which was utilized in an official report by the Russian government. Not bad for a one-man operation.

Paint me out to be a liar and a pedo. I guess it's easier than dealing with reality, Chrissy.

And my URL's [in my news feed] led to news articles, just like the ones that I post on here.

0%

Look at who said it and take a guess LOL.

Not in the least.

No, I didn't. They cited an article about crisis actors that I wrote 4 years ago, saying that it somehow divulged personal information about minors, which is complete bullsh!t. It was just an excuse to take the site down. Here is a copy of the article, for reference / proof:

No, you won't be posting your hateful retard bull**** here. I already told you once. Cheers, grindy

Child porn was a joke but there was definitely some libel from what I saw during the 15 minutes that I took your site seriously. I'd get you some proof but well, you know.

Actually, it's Gyorgy Schwartz.

Well, there was libel in the sense that I said bad things about bad people who did bad things.

I appreciate your honesty.

Idk

Some of those kids were cute

Change people's words in their posts to fit your narrative. Good job.

Anytime!

**** that word.

I don't think anybody has been too afraid to discuss those things and if that's all you discussed nobody would have an issue.


I have no doubt in my mind that you've secretly planned a bigoted mass shooting in your head before, whether or not you intended to do it. That's just based on what you say here. I can imagine MB only being a fraction of what you had in there.

A man of constant Soros.

I hope that was a joke...

If not: Rude as ****.

Lucem’s right.

I don't approve.

Yeah sometimes there are certain things you shouldn't say on a public forum. This is one of them I think. I'm with Mic on this one. I'm not a big fan of MERIT but I don't think he's ever thought of anything like that. I'd hope anyway.

The Zionist stuff I can take, it's at the "school shootings are false flags" thing where he lost me. Besides being wholly disrespectful to the victim's families, it's just ****ing dumb.

France is making my balls tingle.

That's a weird line to draw of all the rude as **** things people say on here.

Not really. You're suggesting something pretty nasty about Merit's character. There's rude banter and then there's uncalled for personal attacks. If I was a mod, I'd draw a line there.

So it's okay for him to hate jews but it's not okay for me to express that he comes off as the type that wants to kill jews?

Again, weird line.

I also live in a country with rising incidents of domestic terrorism coming from people that speak with the same exact rhetoric he speaks with. Maybe you wouldn't understand.

Is Merit personally attacking anyone on the forum? No.
Does he have some weird opinions about things that in his mind are for a good cause? Yes.

I disagree with Merit, and I think he's misguided in some of his views. But that's no excuse to get nasty about things.
Why don't you kick the ball instead of the player and zoom in on the opinions instead of making it personal?

So let's ignore that he's literally told majority of the forum that they're inferior to him. Literally telling elph that he can't have children because nature deems his genes as useless. Or when he went to every other thread personally attacking Frown any time he could.

Yeah, plenty of mass shooters, especially of the variety I'm comparing him to, think they do it for a good cause.

Weird opinions? Like thinking that women are useless beyond sex?

Plenty of us have attacked his views and he's always made it personal. You're really cherry picking here. Or selective memory.

I'm not gonna bother digging into every one of those scenarios that you see as good cases against Merit, but I don't think we'd agree. I don't see him dishing out any worse than he's taking. If anything, Merit's one of the better behaved members, despite the tinfoil rants.

And the misogyny, bigotry, personal insults anytime somebody challenges his views. The fact that you dismiss it as just tinfoil rants is unnerving.

I'll make sure to highlight every trash thing he says for you from now on.


I'll also make sure to highlight every ****ty personal attack that gets made for you so you can have a fair balance of shaming people rather than cherry picking.

Honestly, I thought the comment was a very censored one. I had a whole paragraph to justify it but left it off because I felt it was a bit too personal and out of the blue.

It's not like you're the first MB member to get too personal for my tastes. But I do think accusing someone of being a latent shooter is pretty damn mean.

We clearly disagree on how to handle disagreements with the worldviews of other people. Warnings would be handed out liberallly at times if I was a mod. Which, thankfully for me and everyone else, I'm not.

I didn't call him a latent shooter, really. I said that I believe he's thought about it. I clearly added the "despite intent" thing because people plan and fantasize about things they don't plan on actually doing. Like I said, I censored it. In context, it was meant more about relaying that it's how he comes off to me just based on his forum posts in response to him claiming his blog was innocent.

I agree, I don't like how personal this forum gets or how disagreements get handled. I'm not the type to jump to insults over disagreements, though.

Edit: If HE really feels a type of way about it I'll apologize.

I like merit but he mos def has a mass shooter vibe about him.