![]() |
Quote:
Of course American “communes” don’t try to be global. The problem is capitalism does. Capitalism is based on economic expansion and that means trying to be global by definition. If the “commune” exists on earth it’s competing with capitalist objectives. |
My grandma mom and aunt all lived in a commune for 6ish years. My mom said it was chill expect for all the nudity.
|
^sold.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
eyo pit hair swing by and pick me up and let's get naked
|
Eh so their pits might look like Marx's beard. Can't win em all batty, quit being picky.
|
I was talking about wwwp.
|
Oh. lol
|
:laughing:
|
Quote:
|
Ok so communism is global. So I guess that applies to the anarchist version too, even though it's sorta impossible for me to imagine a global anarchist order.
But then do you honestly believe the entire world is gonna be converted at once? Wouldn't living in a commune be more equitable than a low wage corporate job, and help you at least learn things about managing that kind of dynamic more than continuing to punch a clock will? In other words... Are you sure that a better path to your goal doesn't involve trial and error and leading by example rather than getting completely immersed in Marxist theory while continuing to live by punching a clock or collecting a salary? |
Quote:
I appreciate the lectures on accountability though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Honestly I think you're just too autistic to understand ennui or something.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But probably. I imagine a commune would work a lot differently from a communist government because scale and etc., but getting some sort of sample of what it'd be like couldn't hurt. Though, I don't think they can really cause any sort of change from inside a commune. If they want to change anything they have to play the capitalist game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You just have a doctrinaire and generic statement about global order etc My question was basically about the pragmatic important of trying it on a small scale to learn more about the problems and challenges that will crop up. As well as whether it might be more likely to start on a smaller scale and expand than to be ushered in as a global system all at once. |
I don't do **** I just complain. I'm mostly sick of trying.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How silly of us. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not convinced though... Other orders have always emerged gradually over time. The idea of the entire world going communist at once seems far fetched to me. And Marx had some good points about capitalism but he was also wrong about some things. EG he said the rich would get richer and the poor poorer. Instead both are getting richer but the rich is getting richer faster. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nah cause the price of various goods, especially in terms of technology, are getting way cheaper. So the overall standard of living is basically improving.
Wages have stagnated vs inflation etc in America recently.. but that's over the last few decades alone. In general, you're living way better than Marx ever did. |
Quote:
|
100 years ago you might be in a bread line hoping not to starve.
|
Quote:
Like I said, in general everyone is getting richer. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I keep telling you all to read Player Piano but no one does it
|
I ignore references to women reading to keep my blood pressure down.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.