Originally Posted by AwwSugar

^_^;;

You can argue against the point if you'd like.

But you may notice a little bit later in the thread that I take everything back.

Haha.

Originally Posted by toretorden

You mean to say you were trolling?

Originally Posted by Sansa Stark

I'm down with Jesus, in that case.

Originally Posted by Classof75

Heard on the news the other day that a Japanese moon surveying satellite had found the Apollo landing site, de-bunking the lunar landing "conspiracy" theorest's claims that no landing was actually made.

Originally Posted by loose_lips_sink_ships

That news is a few months old man.

Originally Posted by mord

Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

Originally Posted by Neapolitan

pfft so it came out few months ago, it was new when he heard it, and why are him calling "old man"?

Originally Posted by Neapolitan

If someone has that belief that it was a conspiracy, that's on them, it doesn't seem proper to call them an idiot. I'm more curious in what people believe, what they think about Apollo 11, not what they think of other people. This topic is about if Apollo 11 did or didn't land on the moon, and evidence one has to offer to prove one's point - it's not about name calling.

I saw a stat on the lunar landing it it is only 6% not 20% for Americans that does not believe man landed on the moon.

take care

Originally Posted by loose_lips_sink_ships

Ohh darn I forgot to put a comma between old and man. Now thanks to that lack of a comma my statement has become horribly misinterpreted.

Originally Posted by Classof75

Well, at 52, on this forum I AM an "old man"!

Originally Posted by OBEY

"Never trust your own eyes, believe what you are told".

Originally Posted by crash_override

Maybe even THE old man.