(Lack of) Human Evolution. - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2010, 10:14 AM   #51 (permalink)
( ̄ー ̄)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
I'm not sure how better jobs or higher education relates to biological fitness. I'm thinking a plumber can have as many children as an executive. In my experience, people who get a higher education spend more time studying in their 20s while people who don't are more likely to spend (some of) those years establishing a career and a family.

Is there really selection for intelligence? I mean, you don't want to be with an absolute tit perhaps, but I feel like once you get to an acceptable value, higher intelligence is not necessarily very attractive. It's not like nerds tend to get laid more than others!
Then again, nerds aren't the ones out dying in coal mines or whatever. But yeah, you're right. Have you seen that awful Luke Wilson movie called Idiocracy?
RVCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2010, 12:19 PM   #52 (permalink)
The Omniscient
 
Sljslj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 998
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RVCA View Post
Then again, nerds aren't the ones out dying in coal mines or whatever. But yeah, you're right. Have you seen that awful Luke Wilson movie called Idiocracy?
Blasphemy! I thought Idiocracy was fantastic and a good (yet exagerated) representation of where we're headed. I could honestly see a world similar to that in a thousand years, if the human race isn't extinct by then.
__________________
Sljslj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2010, 12:29 PM   #53 (permalink)
( ̄ー ̄)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
Default

The idea behind the movie was cool, but the movie itself was terrible :-P
RVCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2010, 12:59 PM   #54 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
I don't mean to butt in and derail the flow or anything, but self-awareness, in context with what Tore is talking about (I.E. the ability to recognize one's self as an individual at least to the extent of differentiating between another animal and one's self via observable characteristic relationships) is most certainly provable with the mirror test.
The mistake you're making is thinking the idea of the mirror test assumes the animal somehow has the same concept of self-realization as we developed humans do, when it most certainly does not.
The very basis of the mirror test is to ascertain whether an animal (or human child, which have also been subjects in the mirror test experiment) can use visual or environmental cues to demonstrate a basic sense of self and individuality... or, SELF AWARENESS. Awareness of one's self, as being independent of any others.
Passing this test indicates that the subject already realizes itself as an individual, and recognizes that fact due to being able to distinguish between the mirror image of itself and the actual physical self.
Where one animal may see a mirror image of itself and attack it, thinking it's another animal (which happens), others may recognize that the image in the mirror is their own self and notice discrepancies that may have been placed on the subject for the test, and correct those discrepancies as any other self-aware being would. (which happens).

I think that's a clear example of the difference between animal survival awareness and an individualistic sense of being. While no one is claiming that animals ponder the existence of god or why they're put on this earth or have an awareness of personality, the idea of self awareness in animals is not a new phenomenon and is demonstrated in its true form whether you want to believe it or not.
That's all well and good but I think you are missing the point. I said I was skeptical of the mirror test. I didn't say the mirror test proves self-realization on par with human being. And besides there are professionals who are also critical of the mirror test also. And it is what they say that has more credence imo than someone just saying mirror test is the bench mark of self-awarenss. What goes through the animals mind with image it sees is not known.

The mirror test alone can not prove anything. It doesn't reveal the thoughts of the animal which can not be known exactly like throuhg ESP or the Vulcan mind meld. Since you can not know what the animal is thinking, and it can not tell you what it is thinking when it sees the mirror, what is observe when it see itself in the mirror is open to interpretation. I am skeptical of the mirror test because the actions of the animal is interpretted by the scientist to mean what he wants it to mean. All it demonstrates is a reaction of the animal. And one should be cautious when connecting the dots. If there is some sense of self for an animal, it would be demostrate in it's bahavior in the natural setting of the animal.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2010, 05:19 PM   #55 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Oh well Neapolitan, I suspect you're arguing with yourself. Mirror tests have been used and results between species like chimps and gorillas can be compared. If you can think of a better way to do it, feel free to design an experiment then have lots of people test various species so that we get comparable results and then figure out if that somehow helps us better answer when our ancestors became self-aware.

edit :

By the way, yes - I did see Idiocracy. Not super, but it had it's moments I thought
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2010, 05:44 PM   #56 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
That's all well and good but I think you are missing the point. I said I was skeptical of the mirror test. I didn't say the mirror test proves self-realization on par with human being. And besides there are professionals who are also critical of the mirror test also. And it is what they say that has more credence imo than someone just saying mirror test is the bench mark of self-awarenss. What goes through the animals mind with image it sees is not known.

The mirror test alone can not prove anything. It doesn't reveal the thoughts of the animal which can not be known exactly like throuhg ESP or the Vulcan mind meld. Since you can not know what the animal is thinking, and it can not tell you what it is thinking when it sees the mirror, what is observe when it see itself in the mirror is open to interpretation. I am skeptical of the mirror test because the actions of the animal is interpretted by the scientist to mean what he wants it to mean. All it demonstrates is a reaction of the animal. And one should be cautious when connecting the dots. If there is some sense of self for an animal, it would be demostrate in it's bahavior in the natural setting of the animal.
I don't think the idea behind the test is to provide evidence of what the subject is thinking. The subject, by recognizing the image in the mirror to be itself and not another, clearly demonstrates a basic self-awareness in certain subjects where others fail, and doesn't need to be interpreted. The extent of that awareness would obviously need to be interpreted and could very easily fit the criteria of what you're saying.
I know I'm intentionally being off the mark of the context of this thread as self-awareness applies to it, but I just wanted to point out that the mirror test does indicate a certain level of self-awareness when passed... but I think you're correct in that any ramifications beyond that level of awareness would be speculation when based solely on the mirror test alone.
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 02:51 PM   #57 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
CaptainAwesome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 49
Default

with evolution, the strongest survive. we are surviving all too well..with all our technology and tools we have no need to adapt to help survival. so instead of us it is our society and technology and such that evolves.
__________________
Jesus could walk on water...BUT I CAN SWIM THROUGH LAND.

http://imagegen.last.fm/basicrt10/re...awesome666.gif

There are some who say that life's a bitch, well I'm not one of those: It's what you make of it.
CaptainAwesome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 10:11 PM   #58 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sljslj View Post
It seems to me that humans just don't evolve physically anymore (mentally maybe, possibly even "devolving" mentally at this point). I have a feeling if you were to hop in your time machine (you can borrow mine if you don't have your own) and travel 40,000 years into the past, you would encounter beings physically identical or nearly so.
So is our understanding of evolution completely off? Or is it that we have no need to evolve anymore? If the latter is true, what might bring us to the point that evolution is once again necessary?
It's an interesting thought and I just wanted to see what the great mind at MB (all three of them) have to say about it.
Umm so wrong on so many levels dude. You obviously have not gauged how slow the process of evolution is.

You know Lucy right? The earliest hominid found, the first examples of primates going bipedal. Well Lucy was very different from how we are to say the least. Lots of hair, small skull and small brain, no opposable thumbs etc. It took millions of years for one's like Lucy to start looking like we do now. Tore can fact check me on this one, I'm going off memory of an anthro class I took.
midnight rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 06:26 AM   #59 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuna View Post
Umm so wrong on so many levels dude. You obviously have not gauged how slow the process of evolution is.

You know Lucy right? The earliest hominid found, the first examples of primates going bipedal. Well Lucy was very different from how we are to say the least. Lots of hair, small skull and small brain, no opposable thumbs etc. It took millions of years for one's like Lucy to start looking like we do now. Tore can fact check me on this one, I'm going off memory of an anthro class I took.
Hm, fact check? A lot happens in our understanding of human evolution and anthropology these days Any facts I think I know could already be outdated since I don't try superhard to stay on top of this and stuff happens so fast, but .. At least I can say that Lucy at a bit more than 3 million years age is no longer the oldest reasonably "complete" hominid fossil anymore. She's been thoroughly beaten by Ardi whose estimated age is about 4,4 million years!



Note that it's not certain that Ardi's lineage is the one that gave rise to modern humans though. Many hominid lineages have gone extinct. However, interesting for some europeans is that some of the european (Homo sapien) lineages mixed with neanderthals some many thousand years ago. There are europeans who have about 4% of their genes coming from Homo neanderthalis. So then neanderthals are not completely gone, but live on in some of us .. I think that's pretty cool!
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.