Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   The problems with homosexuality (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/50644-problems-homosexuality.html)

SIRIUSB 09-07-2011 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thom Yorke (Post 1101931)
The whole theory is just illogical though. What if there were two heterosexual men left that were infertile? It's just an insane situation that would never happen.

And I think you're forgetting birth rate...

Birth rate would entail opposite sex relations I would think? If "there were two heterosexual men left that were infertile" then the human species would cease to be . . . get it? :bonkhead:

I think everyone is confusing my simple statement with homophobia, which is not the case. My statement is quite logical and most credible. All species rely on their first instinct of survival . . . same sex relations oppose this natural defense mechanism.

Other than that . . . I am all for loving whomever you desire.

Freebase Dali 09-07-2011 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIRIUSB (Post 1101933)
I have a few theories as to what you excel in . . . but anyway, being that it seems all but impossible to read what I initially wrote I will restate my initial post:

I saw your original post, and this time around, I think it's just as retarded as the first time.

Unless you think homosexuality is some sort of virus that is going to spread and take over the multitudes of hetersexual people, then I'm really not understanding how gay people are going to undermine human reproduction.

Did it not occur to you that gay people existed throughout history, and that maybe more recently, it became a bit more accepted to represent than in some points in history?

SIRIUSB 09-07-2011 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1101934)
So you didn't describe homosexuality as "genocidal" then?

Genocide as in intentionally? No, that is not what I meant.

Buzzov*en 09-07-2011 09:21 PM

siriusb - why did you not answer my question?

Freebase Dali 09-07-2011 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzzov*en (Post 1101942)
siriusb - why did you not answer my question?

It was too valid.

Buzzov*en 09-07-2011 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali (Post 1101943)
It was too valid.

:bowdown:

Janszoon 09-07-2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIRIUSB (Post 1101936)
I think everyone is confusing my simple statement with homophobia, which is not the case. My statement is quite logical and most credible. All species rely on their first instinct of survival . . . same sex relations oppose this natural defense mechanism.

I think everyone completely understood your non point and just thinks it's dumb.

Buzzov*en 09-07-2011 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1101945)
I think everyone completely understood your non point and just thinks it's dumb.

I took it as him thinking homosexuality is a choice....... so yea what he said was dumb.

TheBig3 09-07-2011 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzzov*en (Post 1101942)
siriusb - why did you not answer my question?

Sucks to be ignored huh?

Sometimes I think to myself "these rotten mother****ers ignore me again and I'm putting my dick on the table." And it always goes poorly. Because they do ignore me, and I do put my dick on the table, but I forget this is the internet, and my houseguests are always pissed/confused/bewildered.

Freebase Dali 09-07-2011 09:28 PM

Well, yea... anyone who tries to make an argument that homosexuals will invalidate heterosexual's ability to propagate the species either has to be operating on some dumb ass logic, or is... I dunno.. I can't think of the word... starts with a t, I think.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.