lolbertarians - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2011, 04:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

Lucifer, I can actually agree with you on a lot of points there. I've always been skeptical to communism for basically the reasons you stated, although I think we diverge at the point where you see more value in the individual while I see more value in the individual as part of the collective. And the collective to me includes people being able to reap the benefits that the state can offer them while being protected from the way the state can control them.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 04:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mykonos View Post
Lucifer, I can actually agree with you on a lot of points there. I've always been skeptical to communism for basically the reasons you stated, although I think we diverge at the point where you see more value in the individual while I see more value in the individual as part of the collective. And the collective to me includes people being able to reap the benefits that the state can offer them while being protected from the way the state can control them.
Exactly. You don't need to have the same interpretation of libertarianism that I do. So long as you are attempting to assure civil liberties for everyone, you're still going in the same direction as me. What more is there to argue about?
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 06:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
...And those would be?
Eh? The links are in my signature.
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 07:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

No, you silly man.

What arguments are you responding to? All I saw there was conservative dogma with no philosophical groundwork. Any response I make to that is going to be subject to your conceits as a writer, not a philosophical debate.

If you're familiar with these arguments, show me. Stop talking and say something.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 02:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

Eh? TAC isn't quite conservative dogma - it's the only major Paleoconservative publication out there, really. Wiki Link

Quote:
no philosophical groundwork
Yes, and thank god for that! Philosophy as politics doesn't have a great track record, to say the least.

Anyways, three Libertarian positions (in the American context) I find to be retarded:

-returning to the gold standard
-advocating free trade
-advocating an open immigration policy

...although the creepy obsession with Ayn Rand makes my skin crawl, you claim not to read her, so...
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 02:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
-advocating an open immigration policy
Well, if immigration is open than we wouldn't have to hire illegal aliens because there would be any, and with everyone being paid minimum wage obviously it'd be a more balance labor market.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 02:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
Anyways, three Libertarian positions (in the American context) I find to be retarded:

-returning to the gold standard
-advocating free trade
-advocating an open immigration policy

...although the creepy obsession with Ayn Rand makes my skin crawl, you claim not to read her, so...
OK. I understand, you don't like philosophy as basis for politics. I'll try not going balls deep into it in this thread from here on out.

The gold standard was abandoned as a dissociative tool so that a globalized economy would be less susceptible to economic catastrophe. Libertarianism addresses this by advocating decentralization of public wealth. If the NYSE was split among (for the sake of example) 20 different city-states, that wouldn't be an issue.

Free trade and open immigration are necessary because they allow for the flux of wealth and labor between communities. If one is short on labor, and another wealth, an open migration & trade policy would allow those communities to meet their individual needs. As an economic strata, libertarianism is basically the idea of only using the resources of where you live & work to generate wealth.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 04:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

Open immigration policies are nothing if not beneficial. Immigration fills in for the people who aren't willing to work in the country they're accepted into while also generating more production from a higher workforce of workers skilled in areas that might not necessarily be readily available in a home population. Not to mention the fact that it's an incredibly humanitarian policy, allowing people to find asylum instead of making them die in whatever storm of suffering is sweeping over their country.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 05:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

^ Couldn't have said it better myself.

Also, isn't Britain is trying to migrate further away from Socialism? You know, the "Big Society" thing, taking the burden off the government and pushing those responsibilities onto its individuals.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2011, 01:24 AM   #10 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

It depends. Some people (mostly BNP/EDL yokels) have been calling for us to basically drop any pretense of remotely left-leaning policies and fall into the anarchic/objectivist society they want to see, but they get ignored most of the time. A lot of people have actually moved closer to the left way of thinking due to the recent riots, which demonstrated just how broken our society has become under capitalism.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.