someonecompletelyrandom |
10-30-2012 01:40 PM |
The "strong" should have a moral obligation not to abuse those weaker than they are, and to use the power they could physically exercise over another responsibly, with self control, reason, and rationality.
It's not a Christian thing. Unless you have absolutely zero morals (and altruistic behavior arises naturally, not as a result of religion.) then showing restraint and not beating the living shit out of another person, weaker or stronger, male or female, shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp. This kind of violence almost always arises as an emotional reaction. The girl in this video pissed the little cuntfaced wannabe gangster fuckwad off and he reacted like the immature little waste of cum that he his because he couldn't control his emotions. Nobody is out there "handicapping" physically imposing people, telling them not to react certain ways, not to use their strength. Nobody has to. It's a commonly held belief throughout most human cultures that to act violently and aggressively is reprehensible. To act violently and aggressively at those who can't defend themselves is seen in an even more negative light because the aggressor is usually not seriously threatened physically, thus the action of attack is unnecessary.
People frown on the strong abusing the weak because they have morals.
|