| Neapolitan |
02-05-2017 08:28 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart
(Post 1803026)
|
Let's say there is one hypothetically speaking, and it became a hostile environment for people of Irish decent in the US. You have no trouble with accepting all thirty nine and a half million people in America who claim to be Irish back to Ireland?
It might seem like a daft 1uestion, but that is exactly how Donald Trump is portrayed in the media. As permanently banning all one point six billions Muslims in the world. They leave out the fact that it was 1. a temporary ban, 2. in was for national security reasons. 3. regardless if it seen as necessary by everyone it was still Constitutional.
The ire over the ban beauce it might affect Muslims is disportionate to the lack of any sympathy that 2016 was one of the worst years ever for the persecution of Christians. It is reported that 90,000 Christians were killed for their faith. That is one every six minutes.
Quote:
“I think the Supreme Court would easily uphold the legality and constitutionality of this executive order,” he said, adding that the only way liberal justices on the nation’s highest court wouldn’t side with the conservative justices “is if they totally ignore the Constitution and the law.”
“Hopefully, that wouldn’t happen,” Van Spakovsky said.
|
Is Trump’s travel ban constitutional? Immigration law experts from both sides weigh in. – TheBlaze |
