I agree.

And it’s only anecdotal but I do have a huge cock and a very high IQ.

Melanin isn’t a social construct. Neither is sickle cell anemia.

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/sicklecell/data.html

Wow. The CDC differentiates by RACE so I guess malaria and sickle cell disease are social constructs. Alert the scientific community, immediately. The CDC acknowledges race so they must be racist and therefore must be wrong. Don’t worry black people. Whew. That’s a relief.

Fine. But your assertion that this is the ONLY differentiation is absurd in any century.

I listened until he laid out his thesis and that he’s not claiming there’s no biological difference just that it’s very much by in large extraordinarily blown out of proportion and exaggerated profoundly by culture I realize already agree and understand what he’s saying. It’s just the other extreme, a position he isn’t taking, that biology creates no distinction what-so-ever is also preposterous.

If you continued to watch you would have heard that superficial indicators like skin tone and hair texture are the most pronounced differences, along with suceptability to certain diseases.

if you manage to sit through the entire first video at least he basically breaks down how races don't match up with distinct genetic subgroups in any meaningful way. It's a social construct in that we categorize more based on looks than by genetics. Both sub Saharan Africans and Australian aboriginals fall under the category of black, even though they're not related genetically. And there's more genetic diversity in sub Saharan Africans than there is between certain "races."

Ill watch it but I already know that stuff.

I understand about the genetic diversity in sub Saharan Africa as well although that did surprise me when I first learned about it.

Honestly, I doubt we disagree on anything except for maybe how things should be worded.

elph on the other hand will not acknowledge anything that doesn’t reinforce what he already believes and wants to be true

Whatever.

His conclusion is based on evidence and the best science available.

Your conclusion is based on whether it supports your agenda.

This is the third time I’ve quoted this. Just be aware that this feigned objectivity may or may not support what you already believe. Sometimes the bias is liberal.

Gender as binary and non-binary, puberty blocking drugs for children who identify a certain way, Kinsey scale, bisexuality, homosexuality, fluid sexual presences, race, income and IQ, IQ and violence, IQ denialism, relevance of IQ, extra Y Chromosome, genetic markers, what can passed on through genetics, addiction as a disease, defining addiction, isolating genes for predisposition to anything, genetically modified food, babies with blue eyes, CRISPR, stem cell research, pain killers, rehabilitation, eliminating deafness, deaf culture genocide, human cloning, sterilization of mosquitos, vaccines, AI, militarization of space, demilitarization of everything

Foucault said we’re the most obedient people the world has ever known. We’re really at the mercy of science and technology.

The left isn’t powerless