I don't really subscribe to new wave feminism. I'm anti-procreation as well as antigovernment in general. Getting pregnant is just as bad as getting someone pregnant imo, but when it comes down to it it can only be the choice of the carrier whether to bring it to term.

I was mainly pointing out how your logic is a bit slippery slope-ish can be re-appropriated to suit other biology-based mandates separate from the issue of child birth.

However I still find your opinion valuable and I appreciate you verifying it, no matter how much I may disagree.

For sure, and I don't even disagree with you lol.

All we really are are friends in disguise.

If the man comes up with his half to pay for the abortion and she still refuses the birth and the child are her fault and should be her responsibility. A perfectly viable alternative was offered. If you refuse to get a flu vaccine it’s your fault when you get the flu. If you have a small malignant mole and you refuse to get it removed don’t come asking for help when it’s full blown cancer. Abortion is 100% effective at curing pregnancy. If the man does his part to get the woman one the child should be her ****ing problem.

Totally. I agree.

Please let’s f uck (elph style)

So the pro lifer argument. Except with a sexist double standard. Interesting.

It's not sexist. When, as a man, you've done your deed, the rest is happening in the woman's body and is therefore none of your business as the dude who couldn't hold back. You make the decision when you chose to put your spoon in the Mac and Cheese, to borrow a phrase from Mindfulness. You gotta really twist things out of shape to make it sexist.

Actually it's the child's ****ing problem.