“ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches...”

Practical every time the pigs kill someone it all started because they’re getting up in people’s **** unnecessarily.

That’s gonna be hard - no **** bag Republican-light dems voting no.

Totally totally 100% crucial too.

The fulcrum of that amendment is the word "Unreasonable". It can be very subjective.

That’s why (((we))) need to stack the court.

I don't see Biden stacking the court with anyone who supports anything good besides abortion.

Sound great. Lets see if this works:

(defun c:Stack ();;;;;Define the function "Stack"
(if (= we you);;;;;;;;If "we" is equal to "you"
(setq Stack OH);;;;;;Then set the variable "Stack" to "OH"
);;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;Close out if statement
);;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;Close out defun statement

Yer all heart :rolleyes:
Okay thanks man.
Always bloody nuance, innit?
ERROR! TRUMP TROJAN HAS BEEN ACTIVATED! FAKE RESULT!!! ABORTING NOW!

He’s not going to stack the court anyway I don’t figure.

Just think he should.

Well don’t shoot the messenger.

Police departments aren’t like school districts where the federal government can just start making rules they’re going to follow. They’re not under federal jurisdiction unless their policies are challenged through legal channels.

I get the idea of withholding federal funding or subsidies as a kind of extortion to get the wanted results but that’s just going to end up in an angry cluster**** and inefficient bureaucratic oversight.

I just thought you were speaking my 2nd language with all the parenthesis, also I have no clue as to how to fix that. I'll leave that up to you. That's all that meant. No shooting. Be safe. Much love. Peace.

I didn’t get shot once during the entire Trump administration. Now you won’t shoot me. Biden sucks.