Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Editors Pick (https://www.musicbanter.com/editors-pick/)
-   -   Spill Your Guts: What You Really Think About MB members (https://www.musicbanter.com/editors-pick/41000-spill-your-guts-what-you-really-think-about-mb-members.html)

Isbjørn 04-26-2014 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 1443271)
Briks - for a guy who supposedly bristles every time incorrect English is used, forgot the c in his name.

It's from another forum where "Bricks" was already taken. It's kind of just sticked ever since.

Sansa Stark 04-26-2014 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tristesse

[B
Sansa[/B] – Hot but also terrifying, but I like that she likes that I like MMMBop


LMAO I get that a lot. Why am I terrifying to you?

The Batlord 04-26-2014 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladyislingering (Post 1443147)
How can a man not recognize if a girl has a "baby face"? It's pretty easy to tell if a girl is just a girl, a young girl, NOT a sexual object. Men will just blame it on the fact that they're men (which is somehow acceptable - nobody really knows why it's "ok" for men to be so gross all the time). Maybe it's just super low standards; I don't know. Either way, gross. Little girls shouldn't be fetishized. Ever.



There's a huge difference between knowing a young lady is pretty and popping a boner over a little girl. You can tell the pervs from the decent people based on which route their mind takes.

(I work with this girl who's a few years younger than me and she's obsessed with One Direction. I don't even know who they are; I've never cared about boy bands, even when I was a little girl. Youths aren't worth the time of a lady.)

I'm pretty sure I covered this. Plenty of younger women have physical attributes that are considered sexually attractive. It would be bizarre for a man to not notice this given the biological imperative to mate with females of breeding age. But in general I'm not really attracted to these girls on any great level. Like you say a sixteen year old may very have a "baby face" that does nothing for me, but that doesn't mean her C-cup isn't gonna draw my eye. Can't help it. Boobs are nice. What can ya do?

And we're not talking about being a sexual predator. I would never have any desire to have any kind of relationship with a sixteen year old. Or an eighteen year old for that matter. Or a twenty year old. Or even your average twenty two year old. (Edit: though I would certainly bang some eighteen-to-twenty-two year olds) Even apart from the emotional damage I might inflict I just have no desire to spend time with people that young, which definitely affects how attractive I find them. Still... boobs.

American cultural conditioning also plays a role though. Having a sexual relationship with an eighteen year old, while not something that interests me in any kind of long term way, still doesn't sound totally morally repulsive, while even having sex with a sixteen year old does give me some squeezy feelings. It'd probably be different if I was European though.


P.S. And claiming to be repulsed by men is garbage. If you were a guy and turned "men" into "women", then this entire forum would probably have come down on you like a sack of bricks. So cut the sexist, generallizing bull****.

Black Francis 04-26-2014 09:48 AM

^ this guy.

F*ckin luv him, he's got hilarious jokes but also got alot of knowledge in different subjects.
idk him personally but i luv his post around the forums.

YorkeDaddy 04-26-2014 10:48 AM

ugh women are such gross, repulsive, vile creatures

The Batlord 04-26-2014 11:07 AM

And leaving all those tampon wrappers around the bathroom? Learn to use the trashcan, ladies.

Cuthbert 04-26-2014 11:22 AM

I was gonna point that out as well Batty. Only way you could be repulsed by men for that is if you're sexist to start off with.

Even if the posts were noncey lol at blaming an entire sex for the comments of three cunts on an Internet forum.

Paul Smeenus 04-26-2014 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Benteke (Post 1443418)
I was gonna point that out as well Batty. Only way you could be repulsed by men for that is if you're sexist to start off with.


That's like saying if you're repulsed by seeing two men having sex you're homophobic.

I agree with the second part

YorkeDaddy 04-26-2014 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Smeenus (Post 1443429)
That's like saying if you're repulsed by seeing two men having sex you're homophobic.

No, it's more like saying someone could only be repulsed by men if they're sexist to start off with

James 04-26-2014 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Smeenus (Post 1443429)
That's like saying if you're repulsed by seeing two men having sex you're homophobic.

That's true though, isn't it? I mean I understand not wanting to see it, but repulsed? That's a strong word.

Paul Smeenus 04-26-2014 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 1443433)
That's true though, isn't it? I mean I understand not wanting to see it, but repulsed? That's a strong word.


If I accidentally stumble across gay porn I just react "oh, ick" and move on. But if someone is grossed out by it I'm not going to run straight to the conclusion that the person is a homophobe unless they believe their sexuality is inherently bad and wrong and they are wicked evil people for maintaining their sexuality.

Their *is* such a thing as inherently sick and wrong sexuality, I.e. pedophilia.

Sansa Stark 04-26-2014 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 1443433)
That's true though, isn't it? I mean I understand not wanting to see it, but repulsed? That's a strong word.

Ding ding ding.
Funnily enough dudes who say **** like that probably jerk it to girl on girl porn and see no problem with it. Sexualising homosexuality =/= acceptance. Dudes ****ing is hot imo. All kinds of dudes tbh

Carpe Mortem 04-26-2014 12:11 PM

Ya know... humans are animals.

And when female animals start menstruating, it means they're ready to start breeding. They have reached sexual maturity. A lot of girls start their periods around 13. **** I started mine when I was 11.

Just sayin. We have no problem seeing young animals copulate, even though it's been proven some do experience emotion. As soon as its concerning human beings though ohhhhh noooo we're superior to those ****ing animals.

To be fair, I'm actually kind of a misanthrope and feel bad for everything else on this planet that we haven't been eradicated by our own stupidity yet. I don't think we're that much better than animals, any of us, and I'm sure those of you freaking out about pedophilia do. Please, carry on.

Sansa Stark 04-26-2014 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carpe Mortem (Post 1443437)
Ya know... humans are animals.

And when female animals start menstruating, it means they're ready to start breeding. They have reached sexual maturity. A lot of girls start their periods around 13. **** I started mine when I was 11,

Just sayin. We have no problem seeing young animals copulate, even though it's been proven some do experience emotion. As soon as its concerning human beings though ohhhhh noooo we're superior to those ****ing animals.

To be fair, I'm actually kind of a misanthrope and feel bad for everything else on this planet that we haven't been eradicated by our own stupidity yet. I don't think we're that much better than animals, any of us. Please, carry on.

Uhhh what?? I definitely was not ready to **** anyone at 9 years old. Wtf is this gross "logic"

14232949 04-26-2014 12:19 PM

you had your first period at nine years old?

Black Francis 04-26-2014 12:20 PM

My problem with @Ladyislingerin comment is that it made all men look like scum just for being attracted to the female body.

I understand her point that these are little girls with a woman's body their body are better developed that their mind but just cause we like their figure it doesn't mean we don't know that they she's a frickin kid! (although sometimes they can fool you)

Sometimes we can't control what we think, but we can however control the actions that are gonna define us. so making all men look like gross scumbags just cause we find women attractive is ridiculous.

We take into account other things like, her age, her personality, her maturity.
You know, the same stuff women take into account, we're no different.

Sansa Stark 04-26-2014 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mankycaaant (Post 1443443)
you had your first period at nine years old?

Yup. Didn't bang anyone till I was 15 tho
Also I stand behind everything rissa said

Mojo 04-26-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Smeenus (Post 1443435)
If I accidentally stumble across gay porn I just react "oh, ick" and move on. But if someone is grossed out by it I'm not going to run straight to the conclusion that the person is a homophobe unless they believe their sexuality is inherently bad and wrong and they are wicked evil people for maintaining their sexuality.

Their *is* such a thing as inherently sick and wrong sexuality, I.e. pedophilia.

I see where you're coming from. A straight man being grossed out by gay porn isn't necessarily also gonna be of the opinion that same sex couples shouldn't have the right to their sexuality or whatever. But I think James point is repulsion is pretty strong to be fair.

I don't watch gay (male) porn, because I'm straight. Why would I? I don't get lesbian porn either to be perfectly honest because again, I'm straight. As I'm attracted to women, I'd watch the lesbian porn if I was made to choose for some reason, but I've often found it quite weird as well that some straight men would react so colourfully to the thought of two dudes ****ing yet happily watch women **** all day long.

Carpe Mortem 04-26-2014 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sansa Stark (Post 1443440)
Uhhh what?? I definitely was not ready to **** anyone at 9 years old. Wtf is this gross "logic"

You were, actually. Otherwise your body would have not begun preparing itself to make babies. But the fact you grew up somewhere that places heavy importance on the innocence of 'children', and probably think animals are inferior, makes it difficult for you to understand the logic.

Sansa Stark 04-26-2014 12:34 PM

The fact you reduce people born with uteruses to incubators says a lot about your internalised misogyny, not to mention cissexism, since having a uterus doesn't make one female.

Black Francis 04-26-2014 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo
I see where you're coming from. A straight man being grossed out by gay porn isn't necessarily also gonna be of the opinion that same sex couples shouldn't have the right to their sexuality or whatever. But I think James point is repulsion is pretty strong to be fair.

I don't watch gay (male) porn, because I'm straight. Why would I? I don't get lesbian porn either to be perfectly honest because again, I'm straight. As I'm attracted to women, I'd watch the lesbian porn if I was made to choose for some reason, but I've often found it quite weird as well that some straight men would react so colourfully to the thought of two dudes ****ing yet happily watch women **** all day long.

I never got the lesbian fascination either, but i was surprised to see alot of teenage girls love Yaoi (Yaoi is male on male anime/manga) so it's not just a guy fetish.

Im all for sexual freedom, be happy and gay if that is your thing but im a little repulsed by it as well, i watched velvet goldmine cringing :p:

James 04-26-2014 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Francis (Post 1443452)
Im all for sexual freedom, be happy and gay if that is your thing but im a little repulsed by it as well, i watched velvet goldmine cringing :p:

Wow.

14232949 04-26-2014 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carpe Mortem (Post 1443450)
You were, actually. Otherwise your body would have not begun preparing itself to make babies. But the fact you grew up somewhere that places heavy importance on the innocence of 'children', and probably think animals are inferior, makes it difficult for you to understand the logic.

Yeah, I get it.
You're needing to make the distinction between body and mind.
Your body has reached a stage of development where it is ready to experience sexual activity although the progress of cognitive learning is not always the same speed as that of the bodies.
Some girls although they are physically equipped and capable of sex are simply not ready for the mental implications of becoming sexually active.

If a nine year old were to have their first period (although it seems highly unlikely) they would be equipped for the physical side of sex.
Since everyone progresses at different mental stages, it could take until she's 20+ to be mentally mature enough for sex or it could be 10 years old.

16 is an age where most should have undergone the necessary bodily and cognitive development in order to be sexually active, so I think it's more than fine especially if you live in a society where sexual intercourse is perfectly legal.

Also, I'd like to add. Carpe I like the cut of your mustard, you come across strong minded and intelligent yet you don't aggressively push your views on others. I like that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Francis (Post 1443452)

Im all for sexual freedom, be happy and gay if that is your thing but im a little repulsed by it as well, i watched velvet goldmine cringing :p:

Before anyone wants to give you a hard time, if I remember right, you're from the Caribbean right?
Different culture, society and values guys. Don't flame him over this.

Sansa Stark 04-26-2014 12:40 PM

hey guys scat is pretty gross

Carpe Mortem 04-26-2014 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mankycaaant (Post 1443455)
Yeah, I get it.
You're needing to make the distinction between body and mind.
Your body has reached a stage of development where it is ready to experience sexual activity although the progress of cognitive learning is not always the same speed as that of the bodies.
Some girls although they are physically equipped and capable of sex are simply not ready for the mental implications of becoming sexually active.

If a nine year old were to have their first period (although it seems highly unlikely) they would be equipped for the physical side of sex.
Since everyone progresses at different mental stages, it could take until she's 20+ to be mentally mature enough for sex or it could be 10 years old.

16 is an age where most should have undergone the necessary bodily and cognitive development in order to be sexually active, so I think it's more than fine especially if you live in a society where sexual intercourse is perfectly legal.

Also, I'd like to add. Carpe I like the cut of your mustard, you come across strong minded and intelligent yet you don't aggressively push your views on others. I like that.

Thank you for getting it, and for liking my mustard haha. I am of the opinion that debates of fact are more relevant than debates of emotions and morals.

To take that a step further, there's plenty of research to suggest dogs, for instance, possess a certain amount of cognitive growth. Who's to say when a dog is bred a year after beginning menstruation it doesn't experience similar issues a young human would?

Black Francis 04-26-2014 01:01 PM

What? was i being too insensitive?

I think gay porn is less gay than that movie.

If i am to be honest, i can't think like a gay guy cause im straight but i don't have any prejudice against them.
i have a gay friend that likes to share his promiscuous gay sex stories with me, he has even tried to hit on me and i honestly don't mind. (I take it as a compliment)

However, the thought of living his same life style grosses me out, it's a matter of preference but not imposing those preferences on ppl.

at least that's how i see it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mankycaaant
Before anyone wants to give you a hard time, if I remember right, you're from the Caribbean right?
Different culture, society and values guys. Don't flame him over this.

Yea, yea, ^ this.

im foreign idk any better :p:

(i still don't know what i said wrong though)

Trollheart 04-26-2014 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tristesse (Post 1443199)
Just in case anyone wanted an interlude to your wonderful debate about whether finding young women attractive makes you a revolting person:


If any of you find yourself caring about what my opinion of you is then I recommend spending a weekend in a spa, re-evaluating your life and your goals


Trollheart – His devotion to the journal section is admirable, his taking everything too personally is not. His avatar makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside my cold dead heart.



I choose to take that personally. ;)
Seriously, thanks for the mentch! :thumb:

Isbjørn 04-26-2014 02:32 PM

Someone should make "The Official Sh*tstorm Thread" in order to keep this thread on topic; I don't really think its purpose is ranting about whether or not men are secretly pedophiles or whatnot.

Mojo 04-26-2014 02:34 PM

:offtopic:

Goofle 04-26-2014 03:15 PM

Goofle11: Dumbass mod who - when asked to specify the "Reason for ban" - typed his password for the site because he was being a dumbass. Also needs to change his password.

Isbjørn 04-26-2014 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle11 (Post 1443504)
Goofle11: Dumbass mod who - when asked to specify the "Reason for ban" - typed his password for the site because he was being a dumbass. Also needs to change his password.

:laughing:, maybe even :rofl:

Goofle 04-26-2014 03:19 PM

I think I might change my password to "spam". Thoughts?

Isbjørn 04-26-2014 03:21 PM

"Antisemitic remarks" is safer

Mojo 04-26-2014 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle11 (Post 1443504)
Goofle11: Dumbass mod who - when asked to specify the "Reason for ban" - typed his password for the site because he was being a dumbass. Also needs to change his password.

:laughing:

I've been there buddy! When I was a mod I did it more than once too...

Burning Down 04-26-2014 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle11 (Post 1443504)
Goofle11: Dumbass mod who - when asked to specify the "Reason for ban" - typed his password for the site because he was being a dumbass. Also needs to change his password.

I've done that twice. Once in the "Reason for deletion" section which only mods see, and once on the ban reason form.

Paul Smeenus 04-26-2014 04:01 PM

If it's stupid, I've done it.

*edited to add: except that. I was a super-mod on a vBulletin forum a few years back, and I never made that particular mistake

Urban Hat€monger ? 04-26-2014 04:06 PM

I've never done that thankfully I just click on the box and my drop down list of stock replies comes up.

'Fuck Off' seems to be my most used reply for some reason

Paedantic Basterd 04-26-2014 04:08 PM

Been there. Never followed through though, congrats!

Janszoon 04-26-2014 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle11 (Post 1443504)
Goofle11: Dumbass mod who - when asked to specify the "Reason for ban" - typed his password for the site because he was being a dumbass. Also needs to change his password.

Been there as well, several times.

GuitarBizarre 04-26-2014 06:31 PM

Everyone debating in this thread - I love a good debate, but the simple fact is, to wade into that clusterfuck of an argument is more trouble than its worth. Suffice to say, very little of anything anyone thus far has said, is or was anything better than complete self serving horseshit.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.