I mean your basic point that people who get wasted with the express purpose of having sloppy drunk sex should be fair game is passable, but you just said it so rapey.

I might get some points nutriding but he won't.

PS Oh you meant I worded it badly when I said I like to **** drunk chicks in that thread. ****ing puritanical bull**** I was dealing with. Everyone was like oh no it's wrong to **** drunk bitches who went out looking to get drunk and ****ed. Lord. The **** you have to deal with here.

I'm happy to provide you with a reason to live.
Meh, shoulda leaned more on the poverty angle. He doesn't sound desperate enough.

Start your own popularity thread. Jesus.

Yeah yeah Bat I get you. To y'all rushing them into drunkenness is dubious but my rule is she has to want to be drunk and she never has to say no twice. And no roofies. I play by the rules.

Agreed.

As I already said.

OH put a little twist on it probably to confuse people. It's a clever attempt for OH to garner votes in a bait and switch scheme. Like people understand if there was a battle of the two unfunnies on Music Banter (i.e. TH vs OH) by the thread title and the OP, but when they go to vote they are thinking they are voting OH as the unfunnier one, when in all actuality they are really voting for him as the funnier of the two. What we need is a mod to erase the pole and have them reinstate the question to match the thread title so as to ascertain more accurate pole numbers.