khfreek

That's the only Queen song I've heard that I DON'T like, but most Queen fans manage to love it :\ But yeah, the start and the end of their career will give you some Queen tracks that don't sound like the rest fo their stuff.

__________________
last.fm

ProggyMan

Nah, I'd say yours is far more ridiculous. Bellamy is very good technically and he sounds like a deeper-voiced Yorke.

Alfred

Speaking of Muse, they have no lasting appeal. I got bored of them after about three days.

__________________

Rage Against the Machine

I think this is the only forum on the internet that doesn't absolutely worship Muse, even everyone IRL thinks they're "leeeeik soooo gud!!1!"

Which is I good thing, because it means we're unique.

__________________

khfreek

lulz

__________________
last.fm

ProggyMan

Yeh, seems to stay true to my statement...Bellamy's voice is high but that's just his falsetto.

khfreek

You're saying that as if falsetto doesn't count... the higher a person's falsetto is, the higher their normal voice is. And I know that Thom Yorke can not hit the notes Matt does in this song, at least not anywhere near that volume.

__________________
last.fm

ProggyMan

Ok, but Bellamy still typically sings in a lower register.

sleepy jack

That would be a valid point if you were right. Higher vocals doesn't indicate a higher falsetto, while having a higher pitched voice may help with your actual vocal training it isn't an indicator of anything. It's all about vocal training and your range. An example of this would be say, Morrissey. He has a pretty deep voice but he can hit very high notes unlike other singers with higher voices...like Doug Martsch or any of those My Chemical Romancey type vocalists.

__________________

dac

And I doubt Bellamy could hit high notes outside of falsetto, a la songs like Creep... I'm not going to argue vocal range though, because it's stupid. Their voices aren't exactly the same, but relatively speaking, they're quite close.

__________________