Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
(Post 1051538)
Yes, because it was important to me in the mid 90s.
Not denying I used to like it but it means nothing to me now other than nostalgia.
I like to think that see things for what they are. If I want some loud dumb cock rock I'll put on a Kiss album, I'll enjoy listening to it but I know it's rubbish in the grand scheme of things.
I have heard the first 3 albums far more many times than I care to count due to a friend saying they were his favourite band, even he gave up on them around 10 years ago.
Volume 4
|
So, you're a Kiss guy eh? Moreso than ACDC? What's your favorite Kiss album? I agree with you on seeing things for what they are and I see your point. Just because you know what you're listening to is not groundbreaking and is somewhat dull, it doesn't mean you can't enjoy it.
Well, you should check out Pearl Jam's 2000 album, Binaural. They create an interesting soundscape and it really is a unique album. Only problem with it is the first three songs which happen to be the worst of the album.
Volume 4 is pretty good. FX and Changes kinda drag it down for me though. I read your review on Smashing Pumpkins MCIS, and I know it was a joke, but do you really think it was that bad? Honestly, I think its one of, if not the best double albums ever made.
Two more random questions for you Urban. What's your favorite REM album and if you were forced to listen to either U2 or Pearl Jam all day, which one would you choose? :D
|