Goofle

So, in essence, you agree with your own opinion.

__________________

Soulflower

Soulflower

No what is unintelligent is saying that "I don't like Jacko" as a explanation for why you think JT is better than him.

What does "I don't like Jacko" have to do with his music?

Thats an unintelligent response.

He has other albums and songs besides Thriller. Why don't you do some research and dig for his other songs that don't play on the radio?

djchameleon

Because I have no interest to and I am sure others feel the same way. I have heard all of his hits numerous times over. He is over saturated in the minds of everyone.

Saying I don't like Jacko is a good enough reason to prefer JT over him.

Music is subjective remember? People don't have to break down into extreme details why they don't like an artist. Sure it leads to a stunted music discussion but it doesn't invalidate their opinion any less.

__________________

Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.

FRED HALE SR.

Arctic Monkeys only have one decent song and I can't stand hearing that one anymore.

__________________
" I slashed and burned thru my 15 minutes of fame."

Soulflower

DJ this does not make any sense

Yes, music is subjective but if someone is saying that Justin Timberlake makes better music than Michael Jackson, saying " I don't like Jacko" does not explain why they think Justin Timberlake's music is better. Even making a simple statement as " I think JT's music is more catchier" explains much more than " I don't like Jacko"

It is just a immature insult that does not explain their opinion on why they think JT's is better.

If people want to make outlandish controversial claims such as that then they need to be prepared for people to challenge it. If some people prefer JT over MJ I really do not care because that is their opinion but I just thought it would be interesting to hear an mature explanation for their opinion since this is a discussion board after all.

Saying " I don't like Jacko" is just a immature insult that does not explain anything which is why I said it was an unintelligent response because it was.


I can name 10 Michael Jackson songs you have never heard. You have not heard all of MJ's music which is why I said I think you should listen to his other songs besides his main hits.

I've listened to all of JT's crappy music and I am not impressed with it. He makes the same boring music and it would benefit him to hook up with a different producer because Timbaland recycles the same production over and over again.

YorkeDaddy

MJ made some great music but a lot of JT's songs are on a higher level songwriting wise. Mirrors is a masterpiece of pop to me and has more unique songwriting than basically any popular music, while MJ has never put out anything that I found to be as brilliant as most of what's on The 20/20 Experience at least

__________________
http://cloudcover1.bandcamp.com/
http://daydreamsociety.bandcamp.com/

9-Time Winner of MusicBanter's "Most Qualified to be a Moderator" Award

Goofle

__________________

Goofle

What song is that?

I disagree by the way.

__________________

Soulflower

You had an opportunity to explain your opinion but you chose not to, so don't get upset just because I am choosing too lol thats what you do on message boards


Its immature to make insults as a bases for an music argument when it has nothing to do with the music