The Explain Why You Like This Album ('cause i don't understand) Thread (albums, pink floyd) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-09-2012, 04:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

I wouldn't say Number Of The Beast is dated, it holds up pretty well when you listen to some of the other NWOBHM stuff from around that time.

I've always thought that it's biggest problem is the track sequencing is all wrong. For a start the opening track is probably the weakest they ever wrote, why they didn't use the title track to open the album is a mystery to me. Also I have no idea why they relegated Total Eclipse to the B Side of the Run To The Hills single because I think it's better than a lot of the tracks on the album.
If I was the producer of the album I would have insisted on them writing one more song and sequenced the album like this....

Side One

1. Number Of The Beast
2. Children Of The Damned
3. The Prisoner
4. Total Eclipse
5. 22 Acacia Avenue

Side Two
6. Run To The Hills
7. ***Extra Song***
8. Gangland
9. Hallowed Be Thy Name

I think that would make it a much better album.

Invaders can go on the Run To The Hills B Side.
It was the first album I ever bought, I get a bit anal about it sometimes
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.