Music Banter
Page 3 of 18 12 3 4513 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Biggest Debate in Rock N Roll History ? (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/63761-biggest-debate-rock-n-roll-history.html)

NEWGUY562 07-15-2012 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1208762)
Actually, I was comparing her to Sade and Amy Winehouse—and teasing you about using record sales as a measure of quality.


That was a joke, right?
i was just joking as well :) lol :tramp: i have a ****ed up sense of humor excuse me lol

NEWGUY562 07-15-2012 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mankycaaant (Post 1208758)
I prefer the bloody beetroots.

the bloody beetroots - yeyo - YouTube

Duraddict 07-15-2012 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWGUY562 (Post 1208755)
the beatles > madonna..
wow can't believe you compared the two..
maybe you should check out some of the beatles songs someday it's a miracle you don't know their work.
I enjoy Madonna 100x more than I have ever enjoyed anything by The Beatles.

NEWGUY562 07-15-2012 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duraddict (Post 1208773)
I enjoy Madonna 100x more than I have ever enjoyed anything by The Beatles.
why? :crazy:

Duraddict 07-15-2012 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWGUY562 (Post 1208780)
why? :crazy:
Because I can't relate to The Beatles.

And I don't think they were as creative as they are made out to be. I'd rather listen to their contemporaries, like The Doors.

Ravenheart 07-15-2012 02:03 PM
This whole thread is a mess.

Unknown Soldier 07-15-2012 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenheart (Post 1208792)
This whole thread is a mess.
If you're putting the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Britney Spears and Madonna in the same thread what do you expect.

NEWGUY562 07-15-2012 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duraddict (Post 1208785)
Because I can't relate to The Beatles.

And I don't think they were as creative as they are made out to be. I'd rather listen to their contemporaries, like The Doors.
wow as creative? Damn :nono: the doors fell off after the 2nd album (although morrison hotel is amazing) so that means they have 3 awesome albums thats it..the beatles have 12 then again it's all about taste we simply can agree to disagree

Janszoon 07-15-2012 02:34 PM
The Beatles have twelve awesome albums? Come on.

Unknown Soldier 07-15-2012 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWGUY562 (Post 1208801)
wow as creative? Damn :nono: the doors fell off after the 2nd album (although morrison hotel is amazing) so that means they have 3 awesome albums thats it..the beatles have 12 then again it's all about taste we simply can agree to disagree
The Beatles probably have about 6 or 7 amazing albums, the first half of their career is probably not much better than most of the other pop bands that they were in contention with. The Doors actually had 3 to 4 amazing albums, so if you look at the % they're pretty much on the same level as the Beatles.

Why is it, that at least once a year, we get someone on here that seems to think the Beatles were the be all and end all of music. They were just an amazing band, but then again so are a lot of other bands.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.
Page 3 of 18 12 3 4513 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.