|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
![]()
And now for my next trick I'm going to make the OP look like 10 years ago
![]() Quote:
Like Ghost Jam said, one of the major elements about Nirvana (same as the Beatles) was being there. You do not (and cannot) truly grasp how relevant the band was if you weren't there to experience it. It's not to say they were the only group, or the best group, but they were the one at the top of the pile. Somehow for whatever reason they found a way to resonate with the rest of us. You (or anyone) don't need to get it, or like it, but it's foolish to act that simply because you don't that the rest of us who did are misguided. The other major factor with Nirvana is dependent on personal attitudes towards music. Do you simply measure the value based on the sounds that emanate from the album or do you consider the wider social and cultural impact and influence? Subjective positivity or negativity is ultimately irrelevant when measuring the amount of influence - and whether you like it or not, Nirvana was hugely influential both directly and indirectly on both individual musicians, bands, listeners and the industry. |
|
![]() |
![]() |