|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
![]()
This whole having to write your own material crap has only been a factor since the mid 60s, and even then it's still only a part of a very narrow sphere of popular music.
The most people I tend to hear this from are usually classic rock bores who have opinions on which is the best guitar solo ever or think Led Zeppelin 4 is a good album.
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Italy
Posts: 128
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Thought he lost everything then he lost a whole lot more.... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
So on that note, I will have to say that I was wrong in thinking that all musicians should write their own music. This was a notion that was formulated in my middle school years and I'm still in the process of working through many of the ideas I had then in a more logical sense. But I do have this to say: if I am not mistaken, during the 1700s when Mozart was still alive, it was the composers of music that became famous. Of course, many performers would achieve renown as well, but it seemed that the focus of the music was the actual composition versus those who were performing it. Unlike now when the focus is on the performer. People would go to see Mozart's new opera because he was the composer, and not just because of the people performing the songs. And out of personal opinion, I would prefer the focus be on the composer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,996
|
![]()
Yeah but back then Mozart performed the music himself, or at least conducted it. Anyway you can't compare classical music to modern music: there has never, to my mind, been a classical composition NOT written by the composer/artiste it's identified with. In other words, Beethoven didn't ask people to write for him, nor did Grieg, Haydn, Liszt... the whole idea was to compose and own your own music, AND play it too.
Completely different ballgame. What do you think of my Sinatra point?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
And about Sinatra, although I don't consider myself well-versed enough in his music to give an accurate opinion of his work, I would like to point out the validity in your argument that the songs on his records wouldn't sound the same if not coming from his distinctive voice regardless of whether or not he wrote the songs himself. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,996
|
![]() Quote:
![]() The point I was making about classical is that it was a whole different world back then. There was no such thing as playing others' music: any composer would have to write his own music and play it, so far as I know. As for symphonies now playing their music, well be fair: they're hundreds of years dead. It's not like there's a choice. And if Mozart had played a sonata composed by Haydn, or whomever, I think it would still have been associated with him, just as my other examples are. Not too many people these days remember or even know (or care about) the songwriter, just the song. Then of course you have the likes of Diane Warren, who has written chart-toppers for so many artistes, but achieved no success herself in the actual music world other than as a songwriter. Would you consider the songs she wrote for, say, Meat Loaf or Starship as hers or theirs?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|