Why do people blame Nirvana for killing Hair Metal? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Why do people blame Nirvana for killing Hair Metal? Why do people blame Nirvana for killing Hair Metal?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 12 of 27 « First 21011 12 131422 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2014, 11:18 PM   #111 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default
^ None of that made any sense. If the hall is open to other genres, why should it exclude certain acts over others? It makes it less credible and biased which it is.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:24 PM   #112 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
If the hall is open to other genres, why should it exclude certain acts over others? It makes it less credible and biased which it is.
So everybody should go in at the same time?
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:26 PM   #113 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
^ None of that made any sense. If the hall is open to other genres, why should it exclude certain acts over others? It makes it less credible and biased which it is.
Good god do you even read before you post? Do you really want the Hall of Fame to put every single artist into it at the same time? That'd just be ridiculous. I like the way they do it now so it's sort of a surprise each time it's brought up, although I'm not one to really take it too seriously.
Key is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:30 PM   #114 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default
When did I say ALL acts should be inducted at the same. I NEVER said that.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:30 PM   #115 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ? View Post
So everybody should go in at the same time?
I never said that so why would you assume that?
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:32 PM   #116 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
When did I say ALL acts should be inducted at the same. I NEVER said that.
Because you are saying that it's excluding artists each time a new list comes out. You're basically wanting them put all the artists that deserve a place in the Hall of Fame at the same time. You said it, not me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
^ None of that made any sense. If the hall is open to other genres, why should it exclude certain acts over others? It makes it less credible and biased which it is.
See? You said it.
Key is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:36 PM   #117 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ki View Post
Because you are saying that it's excluding artists each time a new list comes out. You're basically wanting them put all the artists that deserve a place in the Hall of Fame at the same time. You said it, not me.



See? You said it.
LO L can you please quote me where I specifically say this? I have NEVER said this not once in this thread. This post you quoted in no way refers to this statement.

You drew your own conclusion of what I meant by this post which is kinda sad because you could have simply asked me to clarify what I meant.

I have never said such a thing.

This is YOUR assumption of what I meant. This is NOT what I actually said.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:36 PM   #118 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
^ None of that made any sense. If the hall is open to other genres, why should it exclude certain acts over others? It makes it less credible and biased which it is.
It is certainly incredulous that a Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame would be biased toward rock 'n' roll.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.
Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:37 PM   #119 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
LO L can you please quote me where I specifically say this?
Sure:

"None of that made any sense. If the hall is open to other genres, why should it exclude certain acts over others? It makes it less credible and biased which it is."

This time I just put it in quotes.
Key is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 11:39 PM   #120 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default
Just because I said it excludes certain artists does not mean I think ALL artists that deserve to get in the Hall should be inducted in the same year.

Please don't make statements that I allegedly said when I know damn well I did not say it
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 12 of 27 « First 21011 12 131422 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.