Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring? Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-24-2014, 02:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
But what's bad about being generic? Doesn't that help give us a standard to define things by?

Nothing bad about it just explain your reasoning.

You did not really give reasons for your definition which makes your definition vague and kinda meaningless.

All you did was this e.g. Famous person- Icon


Why do you think being famous alone makes someone an Icon?

Explain your reasoning.

I respectfully disagree.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.