Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-24-2014, 02:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I'm just poking fun at you with the last Gaga comment, not angry in the slightest. You pretty much summed it up with famous=icon but (let's go once more) I think that it does go beyond that in that an icon is someone who stays in the public memory without being in the public eye.

You know come to think of it I think these are pretty pointless terms to begin with.
Aw your so cute when your angry

But it is something that they have to that makes them stay in our memory. There has to be some cultural or groundbreaking association that comes apart of pop culture.

It is not just them being in the public eye alone.

Most of the acts that are popular now will just be popular in THIS moment but 50 years from now...probably not.

Decades later, The Beatles, MJ, and so forth are still Icons and still very relevant in today's music scene based on their influence and of course impact.

I don't see that with today's acts.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.