Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   I agree, let's see if you do... (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/81727-i-agree-lets-see-if-you-do.html)

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-19-2015 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1579231)
Wait you like it when an artist puts a lot of work into their music and displays their talent thusly

...but you're a fan of Filter.

I like Filter. We'll leave it at that.

And can we sort of move away from comments like this Frown? I'm so burnt out on reading them, and I think I'm getting a headache from reading over and over who doesn't like Filter.

This guy gets it. We can move on lol.

DeadChannel 04-20-2015 12:05 AM

I think Frownland makes a good point, though. There's nothing wrong with the fact that bands like Filter make music that is fundamentally uncomplex as long as you enjoy it. However, when you're using simplicity w/r/t the amount of work that goes into creation as a criticism against electronic music, there's a bit of a double standard.

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-20-2015 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeadChannel (Post 1579252)
I think Frownland makes a good point, though. There's nothing wrong with the fact that bands like Filter make music that is fundamentally uncomplex as long as you enjoy it. However, when you're using simplicity w/r/t the amount of work that goes into creation as a criticism against electronic music, there's a bit of a double standard.

I see, I see. Makes enough sense.

Frownland 04-20-2015 07:22 AM

Ja, DaedChannel's got it right. I wasn't even saying my opinion on Filter tbh, their music just doesn't sound like they worked all that hard on it to me. Nirvana's in the same boat (even though I do dig them, as opposed to Filter). I think that the outcome of the music is more important than the process it was created in. The creation process can be interesting if the artist takes a different approach (modern classical really comes to mind here), but all in all its the end result that counts.

I'll toss you a pm with some links later today.

Janszoon 04-20-2015 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoNtrivedNiHilism (Post 1579230)
Every single one of those were weird as hell to listen to, but oddly fun and enjoyable. That third one though had me a little worried, like wtf?

I'm glad you enjoyed listening to them. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoNtrivedNiHilism (Post 1579230)
To me it matters how much effort someone puts in to making their music. I think I'm being a bit tough on electronic 'musicians' by claiming it's lazy. But I'll take everyone's word that it's a lot better than I think and there's more to it, so send those recs and I'll pick through them.

I think when you listen to something like the Igorrr track I posted it's very apparent that a lot of time and effort was involved in its creation. To me, the great thing about electronic music is all the possibilities it opens up. It allows talented people to push the envelope and do things in new and exciting ways.

Mondo Bungle 04-20-2015 06:05 PM

I don't even know how you'd go about making a track like this


DwnWthVwls 04-20-2015 06:46 PM

Basic music theory and a soundboard with 100s of electronic sounds? Is there something more going on that maybe I just don't understand?

Frownland 04-20-2015 06:49 PM

Why would you need music theory for that? I don't think they're popping in sounds and going "ja that's cool," it's probably more along the lines of manipulating certain samples and arranging them. Maybe if I had the technology to do it I could, but I'm of the same opinion as Mondo on this one.

Trollheart 04-21-2015 05:03 AM

I feel I must throw this in, not as an example of electronic music because it's not, but as an idea of what you can do with very little real technology but a whole shedload of talent and inspiration, and allowing the listener to almost fill in the gaps...

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1579643)
I feel I must throw this in, not as an example of electronic music because it's not, but as an idea of what you can do with very little real technology but a whole shedload of talent and inspiration, and allowing the listener to almost fill in the gaps...


What does this have to do with what we are discussing?

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-21-2015 08:41 AM

Uh oh...he's barking up Trollhearts tree. But I believe Trollheart is just making a point about how sometimes less is so much more, especially when who makes the music is brilliant, or talented.

Awesome track by the way, Trollheart. Really see what you mean.

And your track was interesting Mondo. I was scratching my head wondering what the dude (or dudes) were on when they did that.

Trollheart 04-21-2015 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579658)
What does this have to do with what we are discussing?

Pretty much what CN says: I have nothing against electronic music (I know but little of it but do like a lot of it) but the original contention was something along the lines of you need talent to make music, and Waits certainly has it in spades. The fact that he uses so few instruments here is I think evidence that you can create something really amazing with very little technology, which is not to put down electronic music, because then you have this, which could not really be created WITHOUT technology and is a real example of someone pushing the envelope of the time to make new sounds and effects with what would have been at the time pretty basic synthesising techniques.

Anyway, don't get all snippy on me. Seems like you're not so much interested in discussing as arguing. I'm not getting drawn into that, just responding to the main point, the OP in which the question is posed as to whether there are any new innovations being made in music these days. I think there are, and while Waits would not be one who would naturally be at the top of everyone's to-listen list, his music illustrates the point quite well I feel.

Course if all you want to do is fight, I'll send Batty your way.
:shycouch:

EPOCH6 04-21-2015 10:55 AM

I swear you started a thread quite similar to this a while ago, and we actually found some common ground in the discussion, but it seems like in the meantime you've reverted back.
http://www.musicbanter.com/general-m...g-music-2.html

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-21-2015 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EPOCH6 (Post 1579727)
I swear you started a thread quite similar to this a while ago, and we actually found some common ground in the discussion, but it seems like in the meantime you've reverted back.
http://www.musicbanter.com/general-m...g-music-2.html

Frick...

No, you're right. This was more just seeing what people would say to what Richard spoke of in the video, but it just so happened to take that turn to what the thread you linked to of mine, was speaking about. Still. I think the two threads are similar enough to see why you linked the other one.

@ Trollheart

I haven't found a way to talk to the guy and not find myself getting irritated. Seems to be the type that likes confrontation.

Mondo Bungle 04-21-2015 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoNtrivedNiHilism (Post 1579678)

And your track was interesting Mondo. I was scratching my head wondering what the dude (or dudes) were on when they did that.

It's a producer and a master flute player, but they often use a lot of "real" instruments and junk. That's one of my go to tracks I like to show people dissing electronic music

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1579711)
Pretty much what CN says: I have nothing against electronic music (I know but little of it but do like a lot of it) but the original contention was something along the lines of you need talent to make music, and Waits certainly has it in spades. The fact that he uses so few instruments here is I think evidence that you can create something really amazing with very little technology, which is not to put down electronic music, because then you have this, which could not really be created WITHOUT technology and is a real example of someone pushing the envelope of the time to make new sounds and effects with what would have been at the time pretty basic synthesising techniques.

Anyway, don't get all snippy on me. Seems like you're not so much interested in discussing as arguing. I'm not getting drawn into that, just responding to the main point, the OP in which the question is posed as to whether there are any new innovations being made in music these days. I think there are, and while Waits would not be one who would naturally be at the top of everyone's to-listen list, his music illustrates the point quite well I feel.

Course if all you want to do is fight, I'll send Batty your way.
:shycouch:

Your post was irrelevant as **** and I figured it was a jibe at electronic music because of how irrelevant it was. I now see that you were just being irrelevant, so good for you, I guess. Yes Tom Waits is talented. We all know that. Sometimes less is more, but less has nothing to do with technology. It's a matter of aesthetic. You could say, based on the nuance of the Tom Waits track, there's actually a lot more happening in that than a great deal of electronic music. Less and more have nothing to do with the medium you use. It's a matter of composition and texture and aesthetic. Electronic music is actually the most capable of minimalism because you can literally create music without nuance. Listening to that Tom Waits track, I actually feel like I hear a /great deal/ of production going on. Like serious amounts of panning going on. This actually seems more technology driven than non-technology, soooooo. Idk the track was an awesome example of what technology is capable of.

So you're right. Sometimes less is more. Sometimes more and more. It has nothing to do with technology. Less or more is a matter of aesthetic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoNtrivedNiHilism (Post 1579678)
And your track was interesting Mondo. I was scratching my head wondering what the dude (or dudes) were on when they did that.

Stop saying things like this. Don't downgrade their musical talent to "oh they must have been tripping lol." It's and ignorant thing to say. That seems to be your motif -- speaking ignorantly of things you know little to nothing about.

Frownland 04-21-2015 06:44 PM

Damn dude calm down.

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1579866)
Damn dude calm down.

That's the irony is that I'm so calm.

Frownland 04-21-2015 06:45 PM

Ah. Just being a dick again for no good reason. Right on.

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1579869)
Ah. Just being a dick again for no good reason. Right on.

I tried to be nice and I was labeled as a dick anyway from the get go in this thread so what's the point to be honest

Frownland 04-21-2015 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579870)
I tried to be nice and I was labeled as a dick anyway from the get go in this thread so what's the point to be honest

You were doing pretty well up until that post. I'll bet your attitude in other threads is what got you that label (notice my use of the word 'again'). CN's comment is hardly degrading, I find it degrading as a person who uses drugs that you would think someone thinking someone else is on drugs is degrading.

Anyway you can make your points and not insult people is all I'm saying. Hell people might actually like your posts more.

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1579872)
You were doing pretty well up until that post. I'll bet your attitude in other threads is what got you that label (notice my use of the word 'again'). CN's comment is hardly degrading, I find it degrading as a person who uses drugs that you would think someone thinking someone else is on drugs is degrading.

Anyway you can make your points and not insult people is all I'm saying. Hell people might actually like your posts more.

I use drugs too. What are you talking about? Go read this entire thread. I think my dickishness is justified at this point.

Frownland 04-21-2015 06:55 PM

I've read it all already and am also disagreeing with people without having to be a dick.

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 06:59 PM

I tried that. It didn't work. So now I'm trying this. This is way more amusing for me, personally.

Ninetales 04-21-2015 07:24 PM

~~~eDgY internet teens unite~~~

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 07:25 PM

If anything contrived nihilism is fulfilling that role. His name is literally ContrivedNihlism

Frownland 04-21-2015 07:26 PM

You guys should make a club then. What part of unite don't you understand?

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 07:28 PM

If I make a club with him there's an off chance he'll make me listen to Filter and 30 seconds to mars and limp bizkit and I wouldn't be surprised if there was some Creed thrown in there, and honest to God, that's not a risk I'm willing to take.

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-21-2015 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579864)



Stop saying things like this. Don't downgrade their musical talent to "oh they must have been tripping lol." It's and ignorant thing to say. That seems to be your motif -- speaking ignorantly of things you know little to nothing about.

So, you're the only person that took what I said offensively. That's because it is in no way degrading or meant to be degrading. What else do you want to grab out of the air?

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579874)
I use drugs too. What are you talking about? Go read this entire thread. I think my dickishness is justified at this point.

What? Vitamin Gummy Chews for kids?

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579885)
If anything contrived nihilism is fulfilling that role. His name is literally ContrivedNihlism

Now you're at a new low man, like, L.O.L. You're bringing my username in to this now, that's pretty ridiculous. If there's anything contrived, buddy, it's your claims about me or what I know or lack thereof.

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579887)
If I make a club with him there's an off chance he'll make me listen to Filter and 30 seconds to mars and limp bizkit and I wouldn't be surprised if there was some Creed thrown in there, and honest to God, that's not a risk I'm willing to take.

So just to drive this all home. Notice how there's been literally nobody in this thread agreeing with you and your claims about me? But the majority or pretty much everyone that has read what I've claimed about you, which is just being a guy that enjoys being a dick for no good reason, happens to be agreeing with me; you're just a dick and nothing at all special about you.

You're a dime a dozen. But I'll be over -----------> here, while I watch you dig that hole of yours deeper, trying to convince people that I'm an idiot that just aren't buying what you're selling.

lols.

grtwhtgrvty 04-21-2015 09:48 PM

I thought you were ignoring me.

Trollheart 04-22-2015 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579870)
I tried to be nice and I was labeled as a dick anyway from the get go in this thread so what's the point to be honest

If this is you being nice I'd hate to see you angry!
Your very first response was bull**** and then a tirade at CN telling him why he was wrong. The whole tone of your replies has been "You guys are so stupid and ignorant; you don't get it. Only I can see how great electronic music is" which is certainly combative. Why you assumed my Waits track was a dig at electronic music is beyond me; if you had bothered to read the text before going off on one you would have seen I was not putting electronic music down. I've tried to explore it a little. It's not my favourite genre but I would never put ANY genre down. I don't like jazz or punk or hip-hop but I realise they're very popular and have relevance within music. Nobody should be that close-minded. Just because I don't like something does not make it automatically crap.

But one thing to bear in mind here: your opinion is not the only one that counts, and you seem to think it is. Like Frown said, calm down, take a breath and try to approach this with a degree of maturity instead of firing off on all sides against anyone who even approaches disagreeing with you.

Otherwise nobody will want to talk to you and you'll end up in an empty room talking to yourself.

grtwhtgrvty 04-22-2015 06:03 AM

Spank me daddy. I've been bad.

Quote:

If this is you being nice I'd hate to see you angry!
No I was being nice at first and I transitioned slowly into being mean whilst CN, bit by bit, began losing his mind.

Quote:

Your very first response was bull****
How was it bull****? I'm genuinely confused cause I reread it like 5 times before I posted because I knew how sensitive he was and I wanted to make sure it wasn't rude and he even said himself it was a good post so I'd like an explanation for that pls.

And the second post was me saying that every generation has crappy bubblegum crap and that the top 40 is irrelevant and static and that he should stop focusing on it so I don't know how that is a tirade. You're gonna have to specify tbh.

Quote:

The whole tone of your replies has been "You guys are so stupid and ignorant; you don't get it. Only I can see how great electronic music is" which is certainly combative.
Specify when I said that pls. It just seems too inaccurate. If anything we were all ganging up on him. I don't think a single person agreed with him. I didn't call anyone stupid or ignorant. Actually he called me that. It may or may not have been implied. :) But I sure as **** wasn't the only thinking it. I was just the one who implied it. But it was directed at everyone, because everyone was agreeing with me at that point -- maybe not the delivery of the post, sure, but everyone was agreeing with the core points I was making.

What actually happened is that I made a deliberate attempt at being nice, despite disagreeing with him. I didn't insult CN right off the bat. I just kept insulting the guy in the video, and those insults seemed to be area of effect in nature, thus offending CN. He got offended before I was offensive, and then at that point, I viewed him as an easy target, and decided to (successfully) attempt at trolling him further. I did that. I was rude. I was an *******, eventually, yes, you are right, and that may or may not have been wrong, but it's not like I came in guns blazing. I was nice at first. Now -- that being said, it is definitely possible that it came off as me thinking he's an idiot, because I do think that. I do consider him to be an idiot, and I can't control my innate considerations. My instinctive, knee jerk reaction was that he is a moron, a reaction I hold to this very moment. Because of this, it is possible that there may have been some subconscious implications. I'll give you that. That being said, multiple people, him included, said I was good at first, and I didn't throw the first punch. I didn't get offended. I didn't flip out. I debated with someone, they got pissed off, and I trolled them. But I was good at first and I want that to be recognized. I'll take my side of the blame. That being said, I wasn't the one who started it. I understand why you're talking to me, because yes, I was being an ******* in my last chunk of posts. I don't know why noone is telling him to stop freaking out and acting a fool. This is the internet and he's like 8 years older than me. I don't think i'm the one who needs to calm down. Maybe I need to stop amusing myself at the expense of others, but I definitely don't need to calm down.

Quote:

Why you assumed my Waits track was a dig at electronic music is beyond me;
Because we were talking about the validity of electronic music and you come in talking about something that was used with almost no technology (albeit misinformation, there is clearly a great of production in the video you linked) and in that moment I remembered when you said that you didn't regard noise music as music and it seemed irrelevant because I don't think anyone has, or ever will, discredit like.. orchestral classical music for example.

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-22-2015 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579998)
Spank me daddy. I've been bad.



No I was being nice at first and I transitioned slowly into being mean whilst CN, bit by bit, began losing his mind.



How was it bull****? I'm genuinely confused cause I reread it like 5 times before I posted because I knew how sensitive he was and I wanted to make sure it wasn't rude and he even said himself it was a good post so I'd like an explanation for that pls.

And the second post was me saying that every generation has crappy bubblegum crap and that the top 40 is irrelevant and static and that he should stop focusing on it so I don't know how that is a tirade. You're gonna have to specify tbh.



Specify when I said that pls. It just seems too inaccurate. If anything we were all ganging up on him. I don't think a single person agreed with him. I didn't call anyone stupid or ignorant. Actually he called me that. It may or may not have been implied. :) But I sure as **** wasn't the only thinking it. I was just the one who implied it. But it was directed at everyone, because everyone was agreeing with me at that point -- maybe not the delivery of the post, sure, but everyone was agreeing with the core points I was making.

What actually happened is that I made a deliberate attempt at being nice, despite disagreeing with him. I didn't insult CN right off the bat. I just kept insulting the guy in the video, and those insults seemed to be area of effect in nature, thus offending CN. He got offended before I was offensive, and then at that point, I viewed him as an easy target, and decided to (successfully) attempt at trolling him further. I did that. I was rude. I was an *******, eventually, yes, you are right, and that may or may not have been wrong, but it's not like I came in guns blazing. I was nice at first. Now -- that being said, it is definitely possible that it came off as me thinking he's an idiot, because I do think that. I do consider him to be an idiot, and I can't control my innate considerations. My instinctive, knee jerk reaction was that he is a moron, a reaction I hold to this very moment. Because of this, it is possible that there may have been some subconscious implications. I'll give you that. That being said, multiple people, him included, said I was good at first, and I didn't throw the first punch. I didn't get offended. I didn't flip out. I debated with someone, they got pissed off, and I trolled them. But I was good at first and I want that to be recognized. I'll take my side of the blame. That being said, I wasn't the one who started it. I understand why you're talking to me, because yes, I was being an ******* in my last chunk of posts. I don't know why noone is telling him to stop freaking out and acting a fool. This is the internet and he's like 8 years older than me. I don't think i'm the one who needs to calm down. Maybe I need to stop amusing myself at the expense of others, but I definitely don't need to calm down.



Because we were talking about the validity of electronic music and you come in talking about something that was used with almost no technology (albeit misinformation, there is clearly a great of production in the video you linked) and in that moment I remembered when you said that you didn't regard noise music as music and it seemed irrelevant because I don't think anyone has, or ever will, discredit like.. orchestral classical music for example.

http://i61.tinypic.com/34nscue.gif

Trollheart 04-22-2015 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1579998)



No I was being nice at first and I transitioned slowly into being mean whilst CN, bit by bit, began losing his mind.

Your first post came across as combative. I've said that already, so how you can call that nice is a mystery to me. You leapt in with both boots, ready to fight and to take on anyone who disagreed with you.

Like I say, your VERY FIRST WORD was literally bull****. Here it is quoted if you don' remember.
Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1578424)
Bull****.

Then you go on to say this:
Quote:

Music is the best it has ever been. This dude is as much of a mainstream yuppie as the people's he's talking **** about. He's literally on this huge label talking about mainstream label *******s.


People who say this is the worst time for music are ignorant as ****, or they are old and bitter because their studio / label slave version of rock isn't viable anymore There's literally a DIY revolution happening where people don't need these labels anymore if they push themselves hard enough.
Quote:

How was it bull****?
I didn't say it was bull, as in it made no sense: I said it literally was the word you used to begin your reply, as shown above.
Quote:

I'm genuinely confused cause I reread it like 5 times before I posted because I knew how sensitive he was and I wanted to make sure it wasn't rude and he even said himself it was a good post so I'd like an explanation for that pls.
It's the tone. You begin a post with the word bull and then go on to use a lot of expletives it's pretty obvious you're angry/upset and het up about the subject.
Quote:

And the second post was me saying that every generation has crappy bubblegum crap and that the top 40 is irrelevant and static and that he should stop focusing on it so I don't know how that is a tirade. You're gonna have to specify tbh.
I don't believe I specifically referred to your second post? Nobody's saying you didn't make good points. Nobody, in fact, is even disagreeing with you about electronic music, just the way you're pushing your opinion as if it were fact.


Quote:

Specify when I said that pls.
I'm going to snip most of this because I can't go through the whole thread picking up points and anyway I wasn't even involved in this till you decided to have a go at me over Waits, when all I did was post the video and reference it. Right, so:

You used the words "your dude rock scene" or somesuch, implying CN listened to all that sort of stuff and shouldn't. Now that may have been a generic "your", as in, "your basic person does this" or whatever, but it did not come across like that. You then jumped on him for mentioning Katy Perry, which he did once, and implying he was a fan (not that there's anything wrong with that) which I don't think he is.

However, the fact that you now admit you don't like the guy and are/were trolling him makes much of the rest of the discussion I was going to have with you totally irrelevant, so let's skip to me.

Quote:



Because we were talking about the validity of electronic music and you come in talking about something that was used with almost no technology (albeit misinformation, there is clearly a great of production in the video you linked) and in that moment I remembered when you said that you didn't regard noise music as music and it seemed irrelevant because I don't think anyone has, or ever will, discredit like.. orchestral classical music for example.
[/quote[]
This I don't understand. Electronic or not, there had been a thread going through the conversation that in order to make music you did not necessarily need computers, software and doodads, just talent, and I proposed Waits's song as an example of that. Of course there's tech there, but not much that I can see: the song survives on its atmosphere and the paranoia the lyric describes. Similarly, I could have posted "Pasties and a g-string" which has only percussion, or "Step right up" which is all bass. The point remains: while some people are undoubtedly talented in creating electronic music (as demonstrated with the JMJ clip, which I notice you ignored) others can create it with very little in the way of tech.

Now you're talking about noise rock. Odd. I believe I said experimental, avant-garde music like Frownland does is not something I understand, and I certainly said I don't regard grindcore as music. But I'm not sure why that is relevant really? Is it because I said I would not put down any genre and this seems to contradict that? Well it doesn't: I, personally, don't view it as music but understand others do, the same way as some electronic music leaves me cold, but I know it's popular. Not entirely sure what orchestral classical music has to do with it either.

Anyhoo, the whole point is that your reaction from the start has been sharp, dismissive and argumentative, even if you don't see it that way. I'm not really interested; I think I complimented your music so I'm not sure why you think I have a problem with you, but your attitude certainly from this thread needs to improve and cool down or people are going to start responding in kind. To say you feel someone is an ******* and will start trolling him without real reason is to me a waste of your time, his and that of anyone else reading or participating in the thread. Surely you have better things to do? I certainly know I have.

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-22-2015 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1580065)
Your first post came across as combative. I've said that already, so how you can call that nice is a mystery to me. You leapt in with both boots, ready to fight and to take on anyone who disagreed with you.

Like I say, your VERY FIRST WORD was literally bull****. Here it is quoted if you don' remember.

Then you go on to say this:


I didn't say it was bull, as in it made no sense: I said it literally was the word you used to begin your reply, as shown above.

It's the tone. You begin a post with the word bull and then go on to use a lot of expletives it's pretty obvious you're angry/upset and het up about the subject.

I don't believe I specifically referred to your second post? Nobody's saying you didn't make good points. Nobody, in fact, is even disagreeing with you about electronic music, just the way you're pushing your opinion as if it were fact.



I'm going to snip most of this because I can't go through the whole thread picking up points and anyway I wasn't even involved in this till you decided to have a go at me over Waits, when all I did was post the video and reference it. Right, so:

You used the words "your dude rock scene" or somesuch, implying CN listened to all that sort of stuff and shouldn't. Now that may have been a generic "your", as in, "your basic person does this" or whatever, but it did not come across like that. You then jumped on him for mentioning Katy Perry, which he did once, and implying he was a fan (not that there's anything wrong with that) which I don't think he is.

However, the fact that you now admit you don't like the guy and are/were trolling him makes much of the rest of the discussion I was going to have with you totally irrelevant, so let's skip to me.


[/quote[]
This I don't understand. Electronic or not, there had been a thread going through the conversation that in order to make music you did not necessarily need computers, software and doodads, just talent, and I proposed Waits's song as an example of that. Of course there's tech there, but not much that I can see: the song survives on its atmosphere and the paranoia the lyric describes. Similarly, I could have posted "Pasties and a g-string" which has only percussion, or "Step right up" which is all bass. The point remains: while some people are undoubtedly talented in creating electronic music (as demonstrated with the JMJ clip, which I notice you ignored) others can create it with very little in the way of tech.

Now you're talking about noise rock. Odd. I believe I said experimental, avant-garde music like Frownland does is not something I understand, and I certainly said I don't regard grindcore as music. But I'm not sure why that is relevant really? Is it because I said I would not put down any genre and this seems to contradict that? Well it doesn't: I, personally, don't view it as music but understand others do, the same way as some electronic music leaves me cold, but I know it's popular. Not entirely sure what orchestral classical music has to do with it either.

Anyhoo, the whole point is that your reaction from the start has been sharp, dismissive and argumentative, even if you don't see it that way. I'm not really interested; I think I complimented your music so I'm not sure why you think I have a problem with you, but your attitude certainly from this thread needs to improve and cool down or people are going to start responding in kind. To say you feel someone is an ******* and will start trolling him without real reason is to me a waste of your time, his and that of anyone else reading or participating in the thread. Surely you have better things to do? I certainly know I have.

Whether or not he was trolling me, I said from the start he wanted a rise out of me, so it's no surprise he'd say he was baiting me along. He went on to ask for praise in his reply to what you said to him, for 'trolling' me and whatever else he felt was accomplished. Has he seen anyone agreeing with him that I'm an idiot, a moron, I'm ignorant, don't know what I'm talking about? Nobody but him has made those claims, and not one person agreed with him on his claims against me thus far. At this point he should just stop. He's new here, and he's going after me, an established member who has good standing with mostly everyone active here, he's going after me for no good reason at all. Do you feel I have been any of the things he says I have been Trollheart? Clearly you do not, as you would have not even posted in reply to how he's handled himself here with words that in no way, shape or form agree with any of the conduct from him in this thread. He says people have agreed with him. Only on what Richard saying being obvious or BS, and that is all. Nobody has disagreed with him about electronic music, as stated by you. There's not other way to view this, other than he's purposely combative to get a rise out of me. He claims he didn't want to offend me from the get go in his first post in this thread, but absolutely every post after it say otherwise one hundred percent so. Even his FIRST post suggested his intent to not offend me, as being an untrue statement.

What exactly dose he hope to say at this point to justify his actions? Absolutely nothing. It's abundantly clear that his intentions were never to find common ground with me, which would be what any person with maturity would do. I genuinely wanted to get along with him, have tried several times. But it is not a possibility, especially now.

Who, aside from him, enjoys taking on the antics of a troll these days anyway? It is such an old, distasteful, stupid thing to pull anymore. He says I'm eight years older than him, so must mean he's at least twenty years of age. People that age, younger, can sometimes be really mature for their age. But for him, it appears that the antics of a juvenile are much to appealing to move on from. I'm not impressed by it, you're not impressed by it, nobody has been impressed by it. And he's going on in his post to you about how proud he is of what he pulled with me, like some juvenile. I mean, really? Who gloats about things like that? A kid, that's who. Someone lacking of any sort of maturity or self respect. He can say whatever more of me he wants after this. But please Trollheart. Don't reply to him beyond what you have. In fact, nobody should. It serves no purpose to encourage him on by replying to him continuously. I'm over it.

In fact. Why not just close this thread? I'm tired of this little game, it took any sort of fun out of it, or desire to have a good conversation about it with the people I intended it for.

But for the record Trollheart. I do appreciate you defending me, though it wasn't needed. I still appreciate it.

Close the thread. I'm done.

grtwhtgrvty 04-22-2015 09:41 AM

No, let's keep talking. I'm busy right this second but I'll reply in a few. You're free to go away but I want to keep talking to Troll.

Frownland 04-22-2015 09:49 AM

How about we keep the thread open and get back on topic.

grtwhtgrvty 04-22-2015 09:52 AM

Don't close the thread.

CoNtrivedNiHilism 04-22-2015 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1580078)
How about we keep the thread open and get back on topic.

How would this even happen with him around? There's no way to ensure he doesn't start a flame war with me unless a mod threatens him with a ban if he keeps with it. I am plenty capable acting like he's not around. But the temptation to reply to something I post I'm sure will lead to him going at it again. This is exactly what would happen every time I talked with Soulflower about something. Soulflower and I are cool now, but this reminds me of what it was like before she left, I couldn't talk to her. It's nice that I can now. But I don't see that happening with grtwhtgrvty.

grtwhtgrvty. Let's try to see if we can find common ground anyway. If you're willing, so am I, but it has to be an honest attempt and you need to make an honest effort to back your compliance with seeing if we can work this out, but showing you are serious about it with your actions after this post.

You want to give it another try at getting along? I can have this all be water under the bridge. All it will take is effort from both of us.

Frownland 04-22-2015 09:58 AM

Uh just don't respond to him and he won't perpetuate the discussion with you. Pretty simple.

Anyway, here's some electronic business that I think takes way more skill than any Filter song.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.