|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: West Coast of Florida, USA
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
I thank you, Necromancer, for taking the time to Actually write something and not just respond with a Video Clip. You are correct that "Rock & Roll" and "Metal" (among others) can be classified as "Pop" music, but i think there is a bit of stylistic difference between those types and "smooth jazz" that separates them both as "pop". that is to say, while both "Rock a & Roll" and "smooth jazz" can be pop, you wouldn't put "metal" and 'smooth jazz" into the same pop category, would you? I'm not sure what you mean by "traditional free jazz" and "traditional freestyle jazz". The "Jazz Fusion" of the 1970's is probably the closest thing to "smooth jazz" in the "Jazz" world. "smooth jazz" is "pop music" for the reasons I listed above, a decided lack of polyrhythms, rhythmic syncopation, improvisation, group interaction and creativity. In summation, I would like to point out that I never said that people shouldn't like or listen to smooth jazz if that's what they want. My main point in all this has been and remains that smooth jazz is a misnomer and that a discussion of it would be better served in a pop thread as it really doesn't belong in a thread dedicated to Jazz and Blues rooster
__________________
Just one more freak in the freak kingdom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|