What is your addiction? (punk, single, American, effects, volume) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: What is your addiction?
Beer 16 5.06%
Water 6 1.90%
Soda 9 2.85%
Music 120 37.97%
Computers 58 18.35%
Yourself 12 3.80%
TV 4 1.27%
Other 91 28.80%
Voters: 316. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2005, 02:25 PM   #141 (permalink)
Slavic gay sauce
 
adidasss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
Default

i'll lighten up when you do, lord knows noone here likes you except for urban, i wonder why....maybe because you tend to attack people and insult them without provocation ( a certain incident with my beloved stu springs to mind )
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Last.fm
adidasss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:28 PM   #142 (permalink)
Five Feet of Fury
 
Spike*Spiegel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: suburbanite
Posts: 761
Default

thats kind of funny, cuz i just started a do you hate me poll and im the only one (so far, that is) that clicked on yes ... 5 min later: AWWWWW they closed it
Spike*Spiegel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:30 PM   #143 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenixpunk
Moderate smoking of marijuana poses minimal danger to the lungs. Like tobacco smoke, marijuana smoke contains a number of irritants and carcinogens. But marijuana users typically smoke much less often than tobacco smokers, and over time, inhale much less smoke. As a result, the risk of serious lung damage is lower in marijuana smokers. There have been no reports of lung cancer related solely to marijuana. Unlike heavy tobacco smokers, heavy marijuana smokers exhibit no obstruction of the lung's small airway. That indicates that people will not develop emphysema from smoking marijuana.
Fair enough , you won`t get emphysema. But it says 3 to 5 times worse , that means for every joint you`re basically causing the same damage as smoking 3 to 5 filterless cigarettes which makes the less frequent arguement pointless & was basically my arguement anyway.And thats not even taking account all the long term damage it does to the brain.

But hey if you want to smoke it , it`s up to you. Personally I don`t
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:35 PM   #144 (permalink)
The Erroneous Hoodlum
 
Fenixpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: West Side Phoenix
Posts: 2,057
Default

you do realize that all of this info youre getting is from a Narcanon website dont you?
__________________
This message has been approved by Shawn Erroneous - The Declaimed
Fenixpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:36 PM   #145 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

if that bothers you i`m sure i can find it on plenty of others

Edit: I should point out i`m not getting my infomation from this site , i`ve heard the same thing said on both documentaries about the subject & from magazine articles. That was the first site that I came across when you asked for proof thats all.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:43 PM   #146 (permalink)
The Erroneous Hoodlum
 
Fenixpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: West Side Phoenix
Posts: 2,057
Default

ya, i would like a differant site, preferably one that is based on scientific evidence rather than one that has an obvious conflict of interest.
__________________
This message has been approved by Shawn Erroneous - The Declaimed
Fenixpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 02:47 PM   #147 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenixpunk
ya, i would like a differant site, preferably one that is based on scientific evidence rather than one that has an obvious conflict of interest.
OK then how about the BBC , one of the most liberal news agencies in the world, who in this article cover both sides of it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopi...abis/low.shtml

Quote:
Cannabis smokers also inhale more smoke for longer periods than cigarette smokers, so they take in four times more tar. If you also smoke normal cigarettes on top of this, your tar intake can hit the roof.

Additionally, the tar phase of cannabis smoke contains higher concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) than tobacco smoke. As PAHs are carcinogenic, the lung cancer risk gets even higher. A recent study by the British Lung Foundation found that just three cannabis joints a day cause the same damage as 20 cigarettes
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 03:07 PM   #148 (permalink)
The Erroneous Hoodlum
 
Fenixpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: West Side Phoenix
Posts: 2,057
Default

If your only argument is the cause that smoke (any smoke for that matter) has on your lungs then think to yourself about how paraphernalia laws directed against marijuana users make it difficult to smoke safely. How these laws make water pipes and bongs, which filter some of the carcinogens out of the smoke, illegal and, hence, unavailable. and, if marijuana were legal, it would be more economical to have cannabis drinks like bhang (a traditional drink in the Middle East) or tea which are totally non-carcinogenic. This is in stark contrast with "smokeless" tobacco products like snuff which can cause cancer of the mouth and throat. When all of these facts are taken together, it can be clearly seen that: marijuana is much SAFER than tobacco
__________________
This message has been approved by Shawn Erroneous - The Declaimed
Fenixpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 03:28 PM   #149 (permalink)
Slavic gay sauce
 
adidasss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
Default

Werd!
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Last.fm
adidasss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 04:07 PM   #150 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenixpunk
If your only argument is the cause that smoke (any smoke for that matter) has on your lungs then think to yourself about how paraphernalia laws directed against marijuana users make it difficult to smoke safely. How these laws make water pipes and bongs, which filter some of the carcinogens out of the smoke, illegal and, hence, unavailable. and, if marijuana were legal, it would be more economical to have cannabis drinks like bhang (a traditional drink in the Middle East) or tea which are totally non-carcinogenic. This is in stark contrast with "smokeless" tobacco products like snuff which can cause cancer of the mouth and throat. When all of these facts are taken together, it can be clearly seen that: marijuana is much SAFER than tobacco
Yeah but i`m talking about smoking it , I`m not saying putting it in tea or drinks damages your lungs. In fact I have no idea why this has been bought up , it`s pretty obvious i`m talking about cannabis smoking.I mean we are talking about the effects of cannabis over tobacco.
The fact is , you take an unfiltered joint & an unfiltered cigarette & the joint has the worst effect on your lungs , thats the point i`m making. Yes there may be ways to combat it through bongs & such but thats besides the point. You can pretty much use the same arguement about cigarettes.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.