I never said all.


Once again, where at, and once again your making this story sound more fake. I really doubt there would be such a decrease in hunters that it became as out of control as you make it sound.

k, sounds fine.

Nah, try going up against a mountain lion, or a shark or a bear or a bull or a porcupine with just your bear hands and will see how long you last. Humans aren't superior in everything contrary to what they think.

It was abuot two years ago adn there maybe 9 -13 incidents where a relatively large number of deer had crossed the road in the middle of the night just a little after rush hour. In one article a woman had said it was a large herd that attacked her car.
I know for a fact they didn't attack her car, nor would they but the amount of blood on her car supported the belief that she hit at least two deer. We already kenw she killed one. It was on the road.
Several other deer had been run over as well.

Back in japan, i used to fish for shark. You could probably pull a bay shark out of the water wiht your bare hands if you were fast enough. The younger they are the stupider they are.
And I have no desire to kill bears.
If you've ever gone camping out in PA, you see them all the time. Just don't provoke them and you won't be in danger. However, I'm not known for my common sense and Iw kill anything for food, specifically for my food. But no, I've never had to kill a bear or protect myself from a bear.
And why the hell would I want to hurt a porcupine? Bulls are different. I'll agree that they are used, granted I've seen bull riders and such but come on. That's just wrong. I'd rather just shoot em. Give them more dignity in death.
And I was referring to owls, snakes, and other birds. You don't enceessarily need a gun. Just good hand eye coordination and speed.
Although I highly recommend you never try to kill an owl without a weapon.

Your avoiding the question. Where was this at.


Okay, you've proven my point. Humans aren't superior to everything.

I voted Yes, but only because of the sports thing. If there would have been 2 seperate polls, one for do you think hunting is wrong for food? and Do you think hunting is wrong for sport? I would have voted No for the first one and Yes for the second.

But I think that hunting for sport is the cruellest thing imaginable, so I had to vote Yes.

meh call me an idiot, but i like animals more than humans. i tend to put them above humans.

hunting is wrong. i hate blood sports, when those guys with a pack of dogs chase a fox and watch the dogs rip it to shreds. as ricky gervais said, (paraphrasing) "something in their psychology makes them want to watch an innocent living thing die a horrible bloody death, they enjoy that. they would like it if it was a robot."

outranking?? are we still talking about a living, feeling thing here? jesus.

i have no respect for people who take part in or condone hunting.
--

yep.. im not even gonna comment on that

I hate it when people say stuff like this.

Also when they say that by not eating meat, we aren't stopping animals from being killed. I don't eat meat because I like animals so I don't really want to eat dead ones. Also the thought of parts of a dead body on a plate is revolting to me.

Actually, making tools is what sets us apart. We have bigger brains and can solve complex problems. That and art. Maybe superior is the wrong word here, how about advanced?

PS...If I had bear hands, I could at least take out that porcupine. :P

Sorry. I thought I said PA. Most occured out in the Pottstown area, at least 3 happened in Philly (Valley Forge and around the Belmont Area), And there the others happened on roads leading out to the Poconos from Philly.
So you have a better idea this is all on the Eastern side of the state.

Which is also to say that if the animal is strong enough it'll survive, adn that you don't need a gun. Which is what I was trying to say.

fact is a lot of extremist animal rights people use this as a reason for why they don't eat meat. I've met too many in my lifetime not to know. At any rate, I was overgeneralizing.

Crowquill did not make the last statement.

so you have your uses after all