Anti or Pro-war
 

from all the disscusion i seen in the other thread to with war, i want to know where every one stands are you pro-war or anti-war

i am pro-war, the way i figure is that if radical military groups decide to get out of hand and start invading someone has to stop them, so there is the my view on war, i dont want a huge arguement on why war is wrong, just state what you are and why

anti unless its an epic battle of olde tyme

how old, roman, ww1, ww2, because im a huge ww2 nut

i wish i was a little bit taller
i wish i was hezbollah
i wish i had a girl who looked good, i would call her

:laughing: You rule.

You mean when people used to fight over land that they actually intended to use for something constructive, like farming or housing, or allowing the pure evil of their orc minions to tarnish the earth with its black, tarry sweat? In that situation, I'm pro-war. Well, I'm pro historical war/literary war but anti actual, occuring war.

If you recognise that military groups getting out of hand and invading (an act of war) is wrong, then shouldn't that make you anti-war? I'm all for people responding when a war starts, but if somebody has invaded then they've already started the war. So if you're against that invasion then really you're against war, no?

no not really, how many times has the U.S. gone into a country that was being invaded to stop the invasion and people want that to stop so i dont think of it as anti-war....and besides if the U.S. wasnt so war loving chances are the Nazi's would still be in power

I don't know. Tell me.

That's true. The war was happening whether or not the U.S. got involved though. The Germans kickstarted the war, the Japanese attacked the U.S., the U.S. just got involved with an already long running war. To be pro-war, wouldn't you have to pro German invasion of the rest of Europe too? That was also war.

The Gulf War, WWII, Korean War, three different time in which we went in to stop an invasion