Polyamory - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2011, 11:25 AM   #21 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

I never said it was logical in practice.

Seriously considering the possibility, I think I would be more willing to engage in a polyamorous relationship with two men than a man and a woman. It's not entirely about preference either; I think I would be much more envious of another woman in a relationship.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2011, 01:00 PM   #22 (permalink)
Chocolate Homunculus
 
Phantom Limb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,293
Default

Yup I'd much rather be in a polyamorous relationship with two ladies. Having another dude in there would make things kinda awkward for me. Also, you guys should read Stranger in a Strange Land.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofle11 View Post
Hip Hop generally bores me now I just listen to stuff I know will be slightly interesting.

Last.Fm

My Bomb Music Shit
Phantom Limb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2011, 03:57 PM   #23 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,455
Default

I think the fact that most people find it so bizarre to be able to share themselves emotionally with more than one person has to do with how they were developed and raised to think of romantic relationships monogamously.

If a person was raised in a family where their parents were successfully in a relationship of say a husband and two wives, they would definitely be more open to the idea that it could work by using their parents as an example.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 08:50 AM   #24 (permalink)
333
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 965
Default

I noticed that sex has been brought into the discussion quite a bit and though I think most people who choose a polyamorous lifestyle typically engage in sex with multiple partners, a polyamorous relationship does not mean you do have sex with multiple partners. The definition seems to be more focused on the idea of being in love with multiple people. I believe this is possible and feel that in past, when I claimed that monogamy was the only lifestyle for me, I was incorporating some form of exclusivity with love.

So, what of the nature and science of what a polyamorous and monogamous lifestyle yields, sexually? When we look at other organisms, we can observe that, for the most part, they have multiple sex partners. This, I believe, ties into sub-categories of natural selection such as sexual selection (intersexual). If we eliminated the idea that we should only reproduce with one partner, how would this affect us as a species?
333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.