Who do you want as the next US President? (country, house) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Who do you want in 2004?
Bush (Republican) 3 21.43%
Kerry (Democrat) 8 57.14%
Edwards (Democrat) 1 7.14%
Nader (Independent) 2 14.29%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2004, 08:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Management
 
Rockafella Skank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAlejo
I gurantee that it was the Canadian gov't that put that in schools, not ours. And as a whole, every single student has to either drop out or take world geography and world history....so it is "forced" upon us.
A funny requirement to graduate in the United States is having to take United States history in high school. That's not the same in Canada is it?
Rockafella Skank is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 07:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Management
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ, USA
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockafella Skank
A funny requirement to graduate in the United States is having to take United States history in high school. That's not the same in Canada is it?

Makes perfect sense to me, the past guides the future. So why not understand the past so you can excel in the future (ie: capitalism)?

I think most people bitch about it just because they thing it's boring, which I can sort of agree but there is some sort of a purpose for it.
Interactive is offline  
Old 02-27-2004, 11:39 AM   #3 (permalink)
Management
 
Rockafella Skank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Interactive
Makes perfect sense to me, the past guides the future. So why not understand the past so you can excel in the future (ie: capitalism)?

I think most people bitch about it just because they thing it's boring, which I can sort of agree but there is some sort of a purpose for it.
Don't get me wrong... I like the requirement and I'm a big fan of knowing your history. But it wouldn't make sense for Canada to learn US history.
Rockafella Skank is offline  
Old 02-27-2004, 02:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
Muck Fusic
 
IamAlejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,575
Default

a requirement for graduation is also taking european or world history....so we learn about the rest of the world as im sure the other countries do.

and bush has condolezza rice in his cabinet, so he can be as dumb as he wants. She makes up for it.
__________________
a man, a plan, a canal, panama
IamAlejo is offline  
Old 02-27-2004, 03:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
Axe Murderer
 
Shan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 62
Default

Out of those choices, I'd pick a monkey.
Shan is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 05:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
Musical Dictator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 222
Default

like I said before... no one president can make EVERY single person happy so why is it worth fighting over something that will never end
__________________
"It's better to try and fail, than to never try at all" - Edgil
Edgil is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 05:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
looking long'n'hard
 
2tonelol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampton London
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgil
like I said before... no one president can make EVERY single person happy so why is it worth fighting over something that will never end
Because otherwise you have anarchy like you have in Iraq at the moment
__________________
Jesus is coming!!!! Look Busy!!!!

http://liquidator.mysite.freeserve.com/
2tonelol is offline  
Old 03-05-2004, 06:52 PM   #8 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,544
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgil
like I said before... no one president can make EVERY single person happy so why is it worth fighting over something that will never end
because the whole point of a democratic system is for the people of a nation to collectively decide who they want as a leader, with the majority winning. of course no one leader will make everyone happy, that's what democracy is for. otherwise we would have a communist system with a leader/leaders who decide amongst themselves what is good for everyone, without the consensus of the population, which could ultimately lead to a dictatorship, in the case of stalin. oh, and i saw a post earlier about how it was pointless to learn to history of another country. Personally, i can't think of anything learnt in high school thats more useful. major political events and revlutions aren't isolated to individual nations. by learning about the course of history in other nations (which effects the entire world) we understand why the world is the way it is, and how the political climate in the world today came into effect. I could go on and give a lot of examples, but i'm not in the mood at the moment.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 03-05-2004, 08:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Management
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ, USA
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber
because the whole point of a democratic system is for the people of a nation to collectively decide who they want as a leader, with the majority winning. of course no one leader will make everyone happy, that's what democracy is for. otherwise we would have a communist system with a leader/leaders who decide amongst themselves what is good for everyone, without the consensus of the population, which could ultimately lead to a dictatorship, in the case of stalin. oh, and i saw a post earlier about how it was pointless to learn to history of another country. Personally, i can't think of anything learnt in high school thats more useful. major political events and revlutions aren't isolated to individual nations. by learning about the course of history in other nations (which effects the entire world) we understand why the world is the way it is, and how the political climate in the world today came into effect. I could go on and give a lot of examples, but i'm not in the mood at the moment.

Not exactly Communism, it's more of an Monarchy...As there's tons of countries like that, ie England..But good point..
Interactive is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 05:41 PM   #10 (permalink)
Axe Murderer
 
Shan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 62
Default

Because if you want to change something you have to make the effort, or you jsut end up sat on your arse all defeatist saying 'what's the point?'
Shan is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.