Two wrongs may not make a right but they can definitely make a funny.

You deserve a cookie once you finally man up and do what you want to do.

Everybody gives a ****, it's just how you handle it. I guess it could be, but I think we'd be walking into paradox territory there. Saying nobody should tell others how to live their life is telling others how to live their life.

Unless you're randomly bringing someone into your point in order to provide an argument with no factual basis.

Oh wait.

Whining at criticism doesn't really prove Lucem wrong.

You consider this whining? Far be it from me to call someone out on their **** when the criticism doesn't make any sense.

He wrote it on the basis of you consistently being a bitch and that's as factual as it gets mate.

The inaccuracy of this post proves my point. Thanks Frown.

*post says Ki is a bitch*
*Ki huffs, puffs, and calls it inaccurate*

At least you're consistent.

Defending myself is now considered whining. I'll make a note of it. I'll have my secretary get back to you.

Getting overly defensive when it's not needed is one of the pillars of whining come on now.

Wembley in a skirt is not a secretary.

It's I read the **** you talked about Batlord after he was temporarily banned and only during his temporary ban for what ever reason. You specifically said you were afraid of discussing music with Batlord here because he makes fun of your taste or ****s on it or what ever whiney bull**** you wanted to say to justify Plankton's decision.

So yeah, it was completely based in fact.

who's the most intimidating mb member

Frownland. You know the dude has some kind of obscure deadly martial arts he mastered as a kid because Karate was too cliche and uninspired.

Edit: Used to be ChelseaDagger, that sexy Mexican chick, because she was savage as ****.

do you often stop yourself from replying to a thread because you see frownland was the last to post in it

No, but in that aspect probably JWB. He said he was going to rape me in the butt or something.

I'm honoured that you think I'd use anything but dumb brute force.

Not as often as I rush to reply when I see you post <3

Chapter 5 – Equal Opportunity: Budget 2017's Gender Statement

Seems like Canada is making great strides in gender equality but focussing on issues that not only impact women, but also tackling issues that effect girls.

Oh... that's the same gender. Maybe next time.

Tell me again about how men's rights activism isn't simply a philosophy of anti-feminist contrarianism.

There's no philosophy. It would just be nice if there was equal treatment. When you're arguing in favour of Men you would be best served to state that outright - as opposed to simply calling yourself a "Human Rights Advocate".

In cases where issues affect both genders similarly you revert back to the broader definition. And swap over to Female when it affects women more.

Ja that's about what I expected.

So that bill specifically, how does it create inequality for men? I didn't read it. It might be more convincing if you actually discuss what you see wrong with the bill instead of just going "lol, feminists amiright fellas?"

Just a few excerpts, but I think if you gave it a reasonable skim you would see what I'm talking about. The term "Women" has 200 hits, whereas "Men" comes up 61 times.

https://i.gyazo.com/3cd0271963d59c07...0eae6ce431.png

https://i.gyazo.com/0df67f962eb04731...46ddae2d84.png

https://i.gyazo.com/c438cf365c832ad5...d98cb178e5.png

Snazzy, irrelevant factoid you've got there.

So this is a big deal to you? Equal wages, increased representation for the underrepresented in both market and government, and curbing gender-based violence for the group that is experiencing it? Maybe the law seems unequally dismissive of men because they don't actually face these issues that the bill addresses on a wide scale. Kind of affirms the idea that men's rights activism is whiny anti-feminism at its core from where I'm sitting.

"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
-someone

Anyway - Norwegian ruling party votes to ban circumcision for men under 16 years old | The Independent

Big them up.

I know you understand the wage gap stuff so let's scoot past that.

How exactly are the government going to promote equal representation in business or government without some kind of forced affirmative action?

Domestic violence shouldn't be a gendered issue, and the disparity between the genders isn't particularly wide.

Any proof of this?

I was going to say forced affirmative action and male genocide but I guess that's not an option for MRA snowflakes.

So let me know if you actually come up with anything bad about that part of the bill.

The women and girls part. Because equality.

Man, this mantra of "men's rights is not just a bunch of whiny bull****" is really starting to fall apart.

Again, wanting equal treatment for men is whiny, but you're out here taking about how legitimate affirmative action programmes are when in favour of women.

Well, when you see a bill addressing issues that specifically affect women on a greater scale than men and can't get past the fact that a bill addressing issues that specifically affect women doesn't also focus on men, it is absolutely whiny bull****. That's because a bill addressing issues that specifically affect women does not define a government's actions towards or ability to protect men's rights.

Just because the spotlight is momentarily not on you doesn't mean that you live your life in the shadows.

You know he's serious so just give us some proof mate.

I'm so angry! My state Board of Education put out some info about how they want to increase money and opportunities for more math and science education in our local schools ("Science, Technology, Engineering and Math In Secondary Education") and I'm really pissed that the proposal mostly talks about science and math. I mean, they only talk about the dire needs of the Athletics division - oh, maybe just only a third of the time! I mean, damn! Why isn't there equal representation for athletes!!! They're treated like they're some kind of second-class citizens or something!!!! I'm all for equality for all the areas of education, but the athletics department never gets the funding or even the proper attention that it so rightly deserves! I think I'll join an anti-STEM group! That'll show 'em!!!






http://tinyimg.io/i/CjEIPxX.gif

Domestic violence is pretty much a 50/50 split in Canada. Also there's I think one solitary men's shelter for domestic violence victims in Canada, even if the percentage was more like 60/40, wouldn't you consider it slightly unequal to have almost no government funding in that area for men?

Yeah great point dude. That's totally the same as writing legislation that specifically priorities women over men in most situations.

No.

Wait, which legislation are you referring to here?