Why does there seem to be a stigma attached to advocate for Men's Rights?

**Janszoon** · 11-10-2016, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

We already shed the first set of eyelids. I'm up for round two, how about you?

If you put them under your pillow, the Eyelid Fairy will give you a shiny quarter.

Paedantic Basterd · 11-10-2016, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

If you put them under your pillow, the Eyelid Fairy will give you a shiny quarter.

She doesn't lay dimes on your eyes anymore?

**Janszoon** · 11-10-2016, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paedantic Basterd

She doesn't lay dimes on your eyes anymore?

Inflation at work.

Paedantic Basterd · 11-07-2016, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle

Foreskin is only a result of many thousands of years of evolution. Might as well cut off eyelids at birth because they are also one of God's many accidents.

I don't think this is a particularly good analogy. How about tonsils instead? Tonsilectomies are not much more invasive than circumcisions and tonsils are prone to infection, are not necessary to survive, and yet, we don't cut them out of children until after they've demonstrated a medical need for their removal.

**Goofle** · 11-07-2016, 07:21 PM

Also can we discuss chins? Who actually needs a chin? CUT IT OFF. Men spend approximately two days of their life shaving their chins when they could be out getting killed in needless wars.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-07-2016, 07:23 PM

I see the argument has now descended into irrelevant banter. Good luck in your fight against "male mutilation" guys lmao.

Paedantic Basterd · 11-07-2016, 07:25 PM

Holy **** this last page of dialogue is full of absolutely stupid bandying about of absurdities

I'm out.

**Goofle** · 11-07-2016, 07:25 PM

A more fair analogy, and I will use that in the future.

Paedantic Basterd · 11-07-2016, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle

A more fair analogy, and I will use that in the future.

Also, wisdom teeth.

I wouldn't refer to the appendix though, since I believe abdominal surgery to be more invasive (and the risk statistics for complications of appendectomies are higher) and thus not equivalent.

**Goofle** · 11-07-2016, 07:33 PM

Also there are detrimental effects to circumcision. I'm not sure why people keep pretending the foreskin is a completely irrelevant part of the body. Jesus Christ.

11-07-2016, 07:25 PM	#7 (permalink)
Paedantic Basterd Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 5,184	Holy **** this last page of dialogue is full of absolutely stupid bandying about of absurdities I'm out.