Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Media (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/)
-   -   What's The Latest Film You Have Seen? (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/26687-whats-latest-film-you-have-seen.html)

Chula Vista 10-11-2016 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1755816)
And yet Spielberg did pretty much the exact same thing in Saving Private Ryan with countless throwaway characters, and yet still managed to not make them into walking self-parodies for the most part.

Agreed. Although Spielberg was re-telling history. Cameron was telling a Sci-Fi horror fairy-tale.

The Batlord 10-11-2016 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric generic (Post 1755825)
Saving Private Ryan has some of the best action sequences I've seen. That movie is gold.

He also had an amazing ensemble cast to work with.


He also had Vin Diesel, who was considerably more believable than most of the cast from Aliens.

BlackMalachite 10-12-2016 12:12 PM

Citizen Kane.
Quite possibly the most overrated film I think I've ever seen. Bar a few creative camera shots, and some notably solid character writing, it was beyond average.

Frownland 10-12-2016 12:15 PM

I definitely agree that it's overrated, but I still think it's a phenomenal film that gets at least 9/10 from me.

The Batlord 10-12-2016 12:17 PM

But who the **** cares what's actually happening to anybody in that movie?

Tristan_Geoff 10-12-2016 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMalachite (Post 1756538)
Citizen Kane.
Quite possibly the most overrated film I think I've ever seen. Bar a few creative camera shots, and some notably solid character writing, it was beyond average.

That's because all film cliches we've used for the past half century were established by that film. It was groundbreaking for the day.

BlackMalachite 10-12-2016 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1756543)
I definitely agree that it's overrated, but I still think it's a phenomenal film that gets at least 9/10 from me.

What exactly was so appealing about it for you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tristan Geoff (Post 1756560)
That's because all film cliches we've used for the past half century were established by that film. It was groundbreaking for the day.

I get that, but an analogy for that would be "just because someone was the first one to pick their nose, doesn't mean that first nose pick was beautiful, it's still just someone picking their nose"

Frownland 10-12-2016 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMalachite (Post 1756575)
What exactly was so appealing about it for you?

The cinematography is outrageous throughout the whole movie and Kane is a fascinating character. It's not a plot driven film but that doesn't make it bad.

BlackMalachite 10-12-2016 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1756579)
The cinematography is outrageous throughout the whole movie and Kane is a fascinating character. It's not a plot driven film but that doesn't make it bad.

That's somewhat my issue with it; it just seemed to be well directed segment after well directed segment plodding along at an asinine pace. The characterization is great, and the build ups are well placed, but overall nothing really captured my attention.

The Batlord 10-12-2016 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1756579)
The cinematography is outrageous throughout the whole movie and Kane is a fascinating character. It's not a plot driven film but that doesn't make it bad.

I just remember being bored by the whole damn thing. Cinematography is cool and all, but appreciating a movie for its technical achievements is Chula-esque, and the acting in general was the same type of pre-70s stuff that turns me off to a depressingly large amount of old movies, so I really can't appreciate how fascinating a character Kane might be as the way he talks annoys me.

Frownland 10-12-2016 12:48 PM

Cinematography is hardly even a "technical achievement" because it's right in front of your face. How the movie looks is hard to ignore.

The Batlord 10-12-2016 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1756598)
Cinematography is hardly even a "technical achievement" because it's right in front of your face. How the movie looks is hard to ignore.

Yeah, it's basically the prose of a movie, but I can read a book with relatively unimpressive prose but with a good story and a lot of heart, while I'd be bored stiff by a beautifully written book that had nothing much else going for it.

Frownland 10-12-2016 12:59 PM

There's a place for both (CK has heart out the ass though).

debaserr 10-12-2016 01:21 PM

I really didn't like Kane the first time I saw it about 10 years ago. I gave it another shot a year or two ago and it blew me away.

You definitely have to look past some of the more dated elements of it, but if you can the story of Kane is haunting and epic.

The Batlord 10-12-2016 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1756614)
There's a place for both (CK has heart out the ass though).

If it's a visually impressive movie, like Gravity, then cinematography is already going to be the star, but in a character-driven movie like Citizen Kane it takes the backseat for importance. And like I said, I kind of hate old school acting, so I doubt I'd appreciate the writing of Citizen Kane regardless, as I'd be too busy telling myself that the way they were talking was just the thing back then and I shouldn't hold it against the movie.

Frownland 10-12-2016 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1756674)
If it's a visually impressive movie, like Gravity, then cinematography is already going to be the star, but in a character-driven movie like Citizen Kane it takes the backseat for importance.

It is and can be both.

Chula Vista 10-12-2016 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1756592)
but appreciating a movie for its technical achievements is Chula-esque.

Why thank you.

There was movie making before Citizen Kane, and then there was movie making after Citizen Kane. That alone makes it epic. Wells was only 25 when he made it, had never directed anything prior, and had never worked in Hollywood. He went into it as a blank slate and pretty much made it up as he went along.

The Batlord 10-12-2016 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1756676)
It is and can be both.

I'd say I'm gonna go back and watch Citizen Kane to see if it clicks with me this time, but we both know I'm not actually going to do that.

Chula Vista 10-12-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1756693)
I'd say I'm gonna go back and watch Citizen Kane to see if it clicks with me this time, but we both know I'm not actually going to do that.

In hindsight it's pretty boring a lot of the time. Welles definitely focused on the technical stuff at the expense of the story.

grindy 10-12-2016 02:31 PM

I thought the story was pretty engaging.

The Batlord 10-12-2016 08:49 PM

And Rosebud is ****ing lame.

Dude111 10-13-2016 01:31 AM

I last saw the movie SLEEPAWAY CAMP (1983) on VHS :)

djchameleon 10-13-2016 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 1757061)
I last saw the movie SLEEPAWAY CAMP (1983) on VHS :)

I'm jealous, I wish I had that on VHS.

Also I finally got around to watching "Don't Breathe".

This isn't a spoiler but I was rooting for the guy who's house got broken into.

Oriphiel 10-13-2016 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 1757061)
I last saw the movie SLEEPAWAY CAMP (1983) on VHS :)

Fuck yeah! So, what did you think of it?

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard 10-13-2016 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1757065)
Also I finally got around to watching "Don't Breathe".

This isn't a spoiler but I was rooting for the guy who's house got broken into.

Aside from cheering for the blonde girl, same. Did you like the film?

Chula Vista 10-13-2016 01:21 PM

Re-watched "I Saw the Devil". First time around I was so wrapped up in the shocking and gruesome aspects of the movie that I didn't realize how brilliant the cinematography is. As good as anything Scorcese, Paul Thomas Anderson, or The Coen's have done IMO.

BlackMalachite 10-14-2016 02:09 PM

Rewatched Interview with a Vampire last night.
Movie was a lot better than I remembered it being.

djchameleon 10-14-2016 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy (Post 1757074)
Aside from cheering for the blonde girl, same. Did you like the film?

Yeah, I enjoyed it. The little twist near the end that's supposed to make us hate the vet, didn't really do it's job all that well. I was still sympathetic to his plight.

Chula Vista 10-15-2016 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMalachite (Post 1757843)
Rewatched Interview with a Vampire last night.
Movie was a lot better than I remembered it being.

Great movie. Ann Rice was pissed that they cast Tom Cruise as Lestat, thinking that he couldn't pull it off.

Once she saw the movie she paid for a full page ad to apologize and praise Cruise's take on the character and how well he pulled it off.

Have you read the novel?

If yes, you have to read "The Tale of the Body Thief" - Probably the best of the sequels. Ridiculously great story.

The Batlord 10-15-2016 09:22 AM

The Tale of the Body Thief was alright, but had nothing on The Vampire Lestat, Queen of the Damned, or Memnoch the Devil. Of course I don't know if I'd want to go back and read those now, as Anne Rice's writing style is ridiculous and she only knows how to write characters who like Mozart.

Lucem Ferre 10-15-2016 11:01 AM

I'm still having a hard time understanding Destroying Daisy. I don't no, I feel as though the baby mutilation genre has completely lost it's punch and is becoming as cliche as the found footage ghost movies. Getting so sick of the movie industry and it's lack of originality. Everything is either a comic book movie or a movie based on literature, nobody has original stories to tell. They see the success of one concept and that take that idea and run it into it's fiery piss stained grave to the point where we can't even appreciate the original movie that first toyed with said ruined concept. I'm sick of it, I'm so ****ing sick of it. The whole idea of baby mutilation was great until everybody jumped on the bandwagon and pushed it to it's limit completely destroying any love I had with the idea. So I feel really bad for SLC Punk 2, the real pioneers of baby mutilation movies who got completely ripped off by bull**** movies like Destroying Daisy and that corny ass Meet The Fockers franchise. **** you Ben Stellar you giant eared freak I'll rip your jaw open with owl eggs and watch you choke and die.

Chula Vista 10-15-2016 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1758307)
The Tale of the Body Thief was alright, but had nothing on The Vampire Lestat, Queen of the Damned, or Memnoch the Devil.

Agree on Rice's writing style. It's an acquired taste for sure. And all of that series was great. I just really dug the premise of Body Thief a lot.

Spoiler for Spoiler:
The way Lestat explains the experience of his first crap after becoming human again is hilarious and almost had me in tears.

Dude111 10-15-2016 05:46 PM

I last watched "ONE MANS JUSTICE" (1995) on VHS :)

innerspaceboy 10-15-2016 11:12 PM

Solaris (1972)

Chula Vista 10-19-2016 02:21 PM

The Usual Suspects

Such a great flick that I have to watch it over again every few years.

Did ya know that the dialogue during the police line-up scene was improvised?
Each actor was given free reign to say the line any way they wanted. The other actors laughing was genuine because they were hearing everyone's version for the first time.

Movie mistake: When they all fly to LA we see a shot of a plane coming towards you and then flying overhead, followed immediately of a shot of the plane flying away and getting ready to land. IN the first shot the plane has 4 engines. In the second it only has 2.

Key 10-19-2016 11:35 PM

Watching Office Space again. Still good after seeing it so many times.

grindy 10-20-2016 11:32 AM

I miss Trollheart.

Chula Vista 10-20-2016 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1760159)
I miss Trollheart.

Thought the same thing when I read Ki's post. :tramp:

djchameleon 10-21-2016 11:38 AM

Nah, watch Green Wing instead.

Frownland 10-22-2016 04:42 PM

I watched about an hour and a half of the extended version of The Twin Towers because my parents had it on. I can see why they cut a lot of these scenes.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.