Paul McCartney - The REAL King of Pop? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-11-2011, 01:04 PM   #11 (permalink)
Stoned and Jammin' Out
 
Mrd00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern California; Eugene, OR; mobile
Posts: 1,602
Default

I read through so far, but must still agree with the OP
Quote:
Originally Posted by starrynight View Post
He must have wrote many more great melodies than Michael Jackson. The whole Michael Jackson as 'king of pop' was just a record company idea in the early 90s.
Michael Jackson... man, nobody gave a **** about him at all between 98 and his death. It was strange to even say you still listened to MJ. And he croaks and he's Over rated after death. Not saying anyone here, but that bandwagon "He's the king" mentality is awful, especially coming from folks that haven't broadened their musical palette (for example, those young enough to like MJ but not have heard the Beatles yet because they were older)
__________________
Mrd00d's Last.fm

Mrd00d is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.