Sex Pistols vs. Ramones (pop, punk, rock, favorite band, single) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Sex Pistols vs. Ramones
Sex Pistols 76 41.08%
Ramones 109 58.92%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2007, 06:27 PM   #271 (permalink)
Groupie
 
visualsynergy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Default

Rotten and the Pistols helped create punk and the revolution, G.G. Allin destroyed it, and I'm going to rebuild it in my own image. Bye bye, Emo.
__________________
"Laugh and the world laughs with you, weep and you weep alone."
visualsynergy is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 12:18 AM   #272 (permalink)
Groupie
 
TheVoid405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Default

Sex always is better.
TheVoid405 is offline  
Old 04-24-2007, 06:22 PM   #273 (permalink)
;)
 
cardboard adolescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
Let's refocus for a second to what Punk Rock tried to do in the mid 70's...essentially blowup the elitist AOR rock culture which began with Sgt. Pepper. As concept albums became more ambitious and complex, groups became more pompous and out of touch with audiences. Groups were using orchestras, over-dubs, session players, making their music very inaccessible to the up and coming garage bands. So along comes punk, erasing the Classic Rock era, and rewinding music to the late 50's...and era when rock was basic, artists didn't have to record 10 songs for and album and when the vast majority of people bought single 45's, not long playing 33 and a thirds. It was no coincidence that "God Save the Queen", "Pretty Vacant", "Anarchy in the UK", could only be purchased as 45's upon their initial release. Not only did these singles absolutely rock harder than anything since "Live at Leeds", they were also the Pistols attempt to subvert the music industry which pushed "singles" to sell more expensive and more profitable albums. Later the singles were compiled for "Never Mind the Bullocks", and as a result, it sounds like a bunch of singles, not a perfectly selected sequence of tunes, which on the other hand, is exactly the way "Rocket to Russia" plays, making the Ramones much more similar to Classic Rock than the Pistols. This was a profound difference between the two bands...one was a singles bands, the other AOR and AOR ladies and gentlemen, is not punk.
So you're saying... Rocket to Russia is a concept album?

I'd much rather listen to a cohesive album than a shambled mess of singles any day, whether or not it is "true punk."
cardboard adolescent is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 02:24 PM   #274 (permalink)
Groupie
 
justinius23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Default

has to be the ramones.
justinius23 is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 03:33 PM   #275 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
Let's refocus for a second to what Punk Rock tried to do in the mid 70's...essentially blowup the elitist AOR rock culture which began with Sgt. Pepper. As concept albums became more ambitious and complex, groups became more pompous and out of touch with audiences. Groups were using orchestras, over-dubs, session players, making their music very inaccessible to the up and coming garage bands. So along comes punk, erasing the Classic Rock era, and rewinding music to the late 50's...and era when rock was basic, artists didn't have to record 10 songs for and album and when the vast majority of people bought single 45's, not long playing 33 and a thirds. It was no coincidence that "God Save the Queen", "Pretty Vacant", "Anarchy in the UK", could only be purchased as 45's upon their initial release. Not only did these singles absolutely rock harder than anything since "Live at Leeds", they were also the Pistols attempt to subvert the music industry which pushed "singles" to sell more expensive and more profitable albums. Later the singles were compiled for "Never Mind the Bullocks", and as a result, it sounds like a bunch of singles, not a perfectly selected sequence of tunes, which on the other hand, is exactly the way "Rocket to Russia" plays, making the Ramones much more similar to Classic Rock than the Pistols. This was a profound difference between the two bands...one was a singles bands, the other AOR and AOR ladies and gentlemen, is not punk.
But on the other hand you could have looked at the Ramones End Of The Century album which is basically them doing 60s bubblegum pop singles with Phil Spector which totally blows a hole in your arguement.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 03:35 PM   #276 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

End Of The Century is basically the best Ramones album and better then anything i've heard by the Sex Pistols.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 06:06 PM   #277 (permalink)
Way Out There
 
almauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
But on the other hand you could have looked at the Ramones End Of The Century album which is basically them doing 60s bubblegum pop singles with Phil Spector which totally blows a hole in your arguement.
Punk was more than just recording retro-records. The Pistols were fresh because they emphasized 45s and songs with biting social criticism. If an early 60's sound were the sole benchmark for punk, then I'd put the NY Dolls ahead of the Ramones because they recorded "Too Much, Too Soon", back in 1974, with legendary 60's producer, Shadow Morton.
__________________
rock n music blog
almauro is offline  
Old 04-28-2007, 05:06 PM   #278 (permalink)
i ruin threads
 
655321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: littleton newhampshire
Posts: 110
Default

punk back then was like about the music and a life style not ripping its apart and anaylising every little aspect of it
__________________
Well there's one thing to know about this town
Not a person doesn't want me underground

Last edited by 655321; 05-05-2007 at 08:26 PM.
655321 is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 09:12 PM   #279 (permalink)
one big soul
 
Alfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,096
Default

I voted Ramones. One, they're like my favorite band, and two, I hate the Sex Pistols. Even if the poll was like Black Flag vs. Sex Pistols, or some other band who I haven't heard a whole lot from, I'd vote Black Flag, because I can listen to a whole song by them.
__________________
Alfred is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 10:03 PM   #280 (permalink)
Diskobox
 
Lizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 660
Default

Obviouuuusly the Ramones
__________________
white and black, are you looking for the sun boy?
the sun doesn't shine down here, no, not in the shadow
Lizzie is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.