Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"? Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-07-2016, 04:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindy View Post
I never really got what art rock is supposed to be. Still not sure whether I agree with you.
Indie does truly suck ass though.
Art rock is just arty rock from the late sixties/seventies. It has no real definition other than being made by arty farty ****s. Alternative is basically that, but given more direction by punk. So it's basically 70s art rock post... punk... you know what I mean. Post-Sex Pistols, post-Clash, post-Ramones... and ****.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.