|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||
|
Whitewater!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,882
|
Quote:
Quote:
Pantera. SOAD. I'm not gonna lie, I don't give SOAD much credit because of the hardcore fans. The more they hype them up the cheesier I think SOAD are.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Fish in the percolator!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hobbit Land NZ
Posts: 2,914
|
I think Opeth fits into this category. They have a huge fanbase, but that leads them to have plenty of detractors. Why?
1.) Many metal fans hate any new metal band which is very popular. 2.) They simply do not understand Opeth. As elitist/snobbish as that may sound, it's true. If you have a band that fuses prog rock, psychedelia and death metal, you're going to come out with an unusual sound. The average death metal fan will think it's strange because he isn't accustomed to prog/psychedelia - he's judging a band which is a fusion of a few genres by the standards of one genre (dm). So, he's not going to understand what all the fuss is about and will probably react negatively. That's my understanding of it anyway.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,219
|
Nickelback fit here. All dedicated music fans think they're the worst most insipid act in all recording history, while the general population almost can't live without them.
EDIT: But hang on, I don't think I'm getting the original point. This is meant to be about who is most overrated and underrated by real full-time music fans, isn't it. So maybe Nickelback and My Chemical Romance etc. don't count. Yeah, I reckon they don't. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|