The DECLINE of the RECORD LABEL : who or what is to BLAME??? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2011, 10:35 PM   #31 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Default

Very good point.

Very good point wisdom
bluesfool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 10:49 PM   #32 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Batty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Australia
Posts: 194
Default

Check out what Marillion have done since they left the mainstream.
They do it all themselves.
Writing their 17th album atm
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/Batt1958/charts
Earworms Rool.
Batty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2011, 06:21 AM   #33 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesfool View Post
I think the record companies along with retailers need to drop the price of cds. I recently purchased a cd at Barnes and Noble for $18.00. I could have downloaded the same album on iTunes for $9.99 This is unacceptable! Cd sales would probably climb if the record companies and retailers charged about $10.00 for a cd. They have no one to blame but themselves for the decline in cd sales.
Umm they do charge 9.99 for cds. You need to learn how to shop and not waste your money at places like Barnes and Nobles.

The Carter 4 was selling for 9.99 at Target.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 01:06 AM   #34 (permalink)
Killed Laura Palmer
 
ThePhanastasio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 1,679
Default

In the past, there was a need for record labels, because there was no feasible way in which acts could communicate directly with their fans which was cost effective.

Now, audio-editing software is readily available to be illegally downloaded, it's completely likely that DAW can be purchased, and fans can be directly involved with the artists for no cost at all.

I feel like the use for record labels has been all but used up; anyone with the desire to play music can now do so on the internet.

It's not necessarily a bad thing either; there's such an abundance of new music readily available that music aficionados are now able to take advantage of it and find new acts they're interested in.

If anything, I feel as though it's more of a renaissance than anything.
__________________

It's a hand-me-down, the thoughts are broken
Perhaps they're better left unsung
ThePhanastasio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 04:00 AM   #35 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePhanastasio View Post
In the past, there was a need for record labels, because there was no feasible way in which acts could communicate directly with their fans which was cost effective.

Now, audio-editing software is readily available to be illegally downloaded, it's completely likely that DAW can be purchased, and fans can be directly involved with the artists for no cost at all.

I feel like the use for record labels has been all but used up; anyone with the desire to play music can now do so on the internet.

It's not necessarily a bad thing either; there's such an abundance of new music readily available that music aficionados are now able to take advantage of it and find new acts they're interested in.

If anything, I feel as though it's more of a renaissance than anything.
I think that it allows for more artistic freedom not being with a record label. If you are really devoted to your music and treat it like art you won't let others manipulate it so they can make money of you.

But the key thing is how well known do you want to be, that can require a lot of work if you want a larger audience of listeners.

Do people still visit radio stations these days and pop in their music?
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 12:01 AM   #36 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanilla View Post
But the key thing is how well known do you want to be, that can require a lot of work if you want a larger audience of listeners.
That's a good point. The only problem is, things don't really get big anymore. I mean there's always the odd Kanye West, etc. But, generally, we have an industry that pushes for a very select few huge acts, a few hundred proxy acts they can cycle through weekly, and millions who just get screwed.

A lot of the choice to not sign to a label is economical as many self produced, self recorded, self managed bands have flourished. Even if they don't flourish, they take home a much larger percentage of the profit.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.