The Future of Rock - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2011, 09:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
They/Them
 
TockTockTock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
Default The Future of Rock

I've been thinking about this for a while now, and I would really like to know what some of the members of this site think...

Here's a question to consider: do you think that rock music still has room to continue to create new/innovative music, or... do you think it is beginning to reach its limits?

I mean... look at jazz and blues. While they both continue to have a profound influence on music today, they both have sort of reached their limit in terms of new and unique musical output... (or am I wrong?)

Share your predictions and feel free to participate in the discussion.
TockTockTock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2011, 10:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

I think rock has pretty much reached the place that jazz has been for the past three decades: there continues to be interesting stuff created by the experimentalists of the genre but mostly it's become backward looking and somewhat bland.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2011, 10:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Aficionado of Fine Filth
 
Psy-Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,798
Default

Here's a quote by the late, great, Don Van Vliet...

"If your brain is part of the process, you're missing it. You should play like a drowning man, struggling to reach shore. If you can trap that feeling, then you have something that is fur bearing."

That might be the problem with the state of rock today. (Or, perhaps, any other style of music.)

Too many musicians over-thinking the music they're playing, instead of just letting go and letting it rip like there's no tomorrow.
Psy-Fi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2011, 11:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Pat View Post
I mean... look at jazz and blues. While they both continue to have a profound influence on music today, they both have sort of reached their limit in terms of new and unique musical output... (or am I wrong?)
Somewhat. Jazz is an accumulative genre so anything it fuses with becomes, and expands it making it theoretically infinite. Blues, however, is intentionally limited but moreso as a basis for the rhythmic elements that make rock, jazz, funk, and r&b.

I think rock is dead, and rightfully so. Then again, I'm hoping with the internet's eye openings of the worlds of music as a whole, that concept genre itself will be someday.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 12:35 AM   #5 (permalink)
Living under the bridge
 
TheNiceGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Pat View Post
I've been thinking about this for a while now, and I would really like to know what some of the members of this site think...

Here's a question to consider: do you think that rock music still has room to continue to create new/innovative music, or... do you think it is beginning to reach its limits?

I mean... look at jazz and blues. While they both continue to have a profound influence on music today, they both have sort of reached their limit in terms of new and unique musical output... (or am I wrong?)

Share your predictions and feel free to participate in the discussion.
http://starling.rinet.ru/music/essay1.htm

For those who are interested this essay here by George Starosin has a good look at the idea that Rock is reached it's "limits".

Personally I think Rock has stagnated yes, but there are still a number of good albums coming out these days.
__________________
My Music Review Blog-It's Only Rock 'n' Roll

There is no Dark Side of the Moon really, matter of fact it's all dark...
TheNiceGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 02:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

i think rock will die and be replaced by hip-hop

serious
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 03:11 AM   #7 (permalink)
Living under the bridge
 
TheNiceGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
i think rock will die and be replaced by hip-hop

serious
I would cry if that happened...
__________________
My Music Review Blog-It's Only Rock 'n' Roll

There is no Dark Side of the Moon really, matter of fact it's all dark...
TheNiceGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 06:16 AM   #8 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNiceGuy View Post
I would cry if that happened...
It's already happened.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 09:02 AM   #9 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

The future of rock is a hard thing to predict, if not completely impossible in my opinion. We will have to see what happens in another 20 or 30 years from now. I do know that different individual music styles seem to revolve in cycles with time through previous musical influences, and just seem to keep splintering off into other newly formed sub-genres. But no one can actually say with 100% accuracy what will happen to rock (or any other genre) as far as predicting the future of any particular genre.

I personally think that the Rap genre is a lot more vulnerable (in the future) with the possibility to decline in popularity than the Rock/Metal genres are. Which brings the only possible insight and prediction that I could make with any validity. Which is..that certain genres may recede in popularity to a more underground audience and just simply become less popular. But I in no way expect any genre of music (rock for example) to be wiped completely off the map. Just a decline in popularity (maybe).

Progressive Metal is currently more popular than ever before and still on the rise here in the U.S. if that tells us anything?
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 11:57 AM   #10 (permalink)
They/Them
 
TockTockTock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNiceGuy View Post
http://starling.rinet.ru/music/essay1.htm

For those who are interested this essay here by George Starosin has a good look at the idea that Rock is reached it's "limits".
Yea... this guy sort of lost most of his credibility with me when he said The Beatles and their contemporaries (i.e. The Who, Beach Boys, etc) were the first to fuse "true" artistic expression/musicianship with popular music and that their (The British Invasion's) work was the most important musical "revolution" in the 20th Century. In doing this, he almost completely dismisses jazz and starts off on a short and negatively-opinionated tangent about jazz listeners. His obsession with these bands also resulted in him leaving out other important figures in 60s rock music, such as: Captain Beefheart, The Monks, Jimi Hendrix, Frank Zappa, King Crimson, The Red Krayola, and The Velvet Underground.

Other than all of that bullshit, however, I feel he makes a few decent points about the future (in other words... the end) of rock music...

Last edited by TockTockTock; 09-04-2011 at 12:03 PM.
TockTockTock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.