|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
Palm Muted
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 168
|
![]() Quote:
We are obviously not (on the same page), so let's not argue - I'm just "expressing my opinion", to euphemise. I think experience in the metal genre is relevant to judging how innovative and skilled Metallica are, which I'm not saying you don't have... But Lamb of God is arguably the biggest metal band out there today, and for good reason. I guarantee that almost anyone in that band can outplay Metallica, and I think from a technical and creative perspective they outdo them as well. I'm not discounting Metallica's early material - it remains some of my favourite music in my entire library - but metal has evolved since, even as Metallica had a hand in leading it's evolution. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
![]() Quote:
I think the distinction to make here is you're arguing Metal, and I'm saying music in general. In my argument, Metallica wins. Given my overall musical influence, I'd be more inclined to the diversified band. Metallica drew influence for their greatest album from, among other acts, Rush. For them to come that distance says to me their taking in influences and making it their own. Modern Metal bores me because its all the same concept. Only if you immerse yourself in only metal do they start to sound reasonably different. I think thats where I am, and probably the reason we're so far apart musically.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|