Chula Vista |
08-21-2016 12:09 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwertyy
(Post 1733121)
If I told you the new Pitbull album was great, and you said you didn't like it, it would be stupid for me to say "well you just don't understand, everyone my age loves the album!"
|
Well, in 1971 if I told my dad the new Who album was great he'd say he didn't like it and I'd say "well you just don't understand, everyone my age loves the album!" :p:
A better analogy would be if 30 years from now you tell some folks in their 20s about how great that same Pitbull album is/was and they call you a sheep and tell you the record is mediocre at best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
(Post 1733124)
Burzum: 326,600 listeners on last.fm
The Who: 2,612,600 listeners on last.fm The numbers don't lie guys, The Who is obviously better.
|
Now you're being ridiculous. If an album is released back in 1971 and makes its way into the top 5 in album charts (at the time of its release) all over the world, then that just says it's an album that a lot of people really liked back then.
In the subsequent decades have a lot of people bought it based on its rep? Sure. Have a lot of people bought it cause they heard some of the tracks on a classic rock station and thought, hey that's really good. Sure. Have a bunch of critics and music sites decided that based on its staying power, continued fan base, and their own critical assessment of the album that it's an all time classic? Sure.
If some snotty nosed 20-something thinks it's mediocre, and that anyone who likes it must be a sheep - does that take anything away from the album? Hell no.
|