10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-10-2012, 03:04 AM   #11 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Napoli, Italy
Posts: 47
Default
I mean, is it really necessary to state than one band is better than the other and the other sucks?
Talkin about the Beatles and the Stones is like debating if Mozart is better then Beethoven or Picasso is worst than van Gogh.
makes no sense at all, imho, and no answer will be the definitive one, 'cause both artists are at the top of their categories and, most important things, tastes are subjective.
Regards
Fabio is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.