10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-11-2012, 05:26 AM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Rock N' Roll Clown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabio View Post
I mean, is it really necessary to state than one band is better than the other and the other sucks?
Talkin about the Beatles and the Stones is like debating if Mozart is better then Beethoven or Picasso is worst than van Gogh.
makes no sense at all, imho, and no answer will be the definitive one, 'cause both artists are at the top of their categories and, most important things, tastes are subjective.
Regards
I don't think that ''one band is better and the other sucks'' is what are we talking about here. Nobody said that one of the bands sucked. And isn't that the purpouse of all forums, to discuss and debate about stuff. Of course there can never be a definitive answer but there can never be a definitive answer to anything in the universe. It's all about points of view. And that's definitely not the point here and in all forums, the point is to share opinions and different points of view, and to improve our knowledgement.
__________________
Rock N' Roll Clown is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.