The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (rock, single, albums, Atmosphere) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-08-2008, 11:42 AM   #511 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Pow R. Toc H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen
I'll be impressed.
heh, I doubt that. All you do in every thread you post in is strike down others' opinion on things and then state yours as if it's fact.
__________________
the sun's not yellow, it's chicken
Pow R. Toc H. is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 01:25 PM   #512 (permalink)
Groupie
 
thedaytripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
Default

Rainard Jalen apparently has a stick up his ass. has he justified any of his statements? has he compared the stones to the beatles as well as i? next time you should think about what youre saying, rather than showing your bitter opinion towards others with vocabulary and vengance. *******. oh and by the way, listen to polythene pam and its only rock and roll and see who wins the argument
thedaytripper is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 01:29 PM   #513 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

^ I'll look forward to you keeping your own council.

Keep it civil please.
The next flame/insult gets a warning.
right-track is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 03:32 PM   #514 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pow R. Toc H. View Post
heh, I doubt that. All you do in every thread you post in is strike down others' opinion on things and then state yours as if it's fact.
Right, and you've been here to observe all that for what, 3 days? Anyway, this is a message board, so that's kinda the whole point: be opinionated and speak your mind.

I will rarely "strike down" an opinion unless it's plain obsessive bias, extreme and absurd hyperbole, and the like. I even agree that the Beatles are on the whole better than the Stones, but in that case it should be justified by true statements, not blinding fibs like ridiculous overexaggeration of John's and George's instrumental skills. And seriously, Keith Richards is so much stronger a pure rock'n'roll guitarist than Harrison that it's not even funny.
Rainard Jalen is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 04:01 PM   #515 (permalink)
Groupie
 
thedaytripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
Default

i dont want to argue anymore, can we just put this behind us and talk about music
thedaytripper is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 09:13 PM   #516 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Pow R. Toc H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen
Right, and you've been here to observe all that for what, 3 days?
you don't have to post to observe.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen
I will rarely "strike down" an opinion unless it's plain obsessive bias
You seem to be on the firing end of the 'obsessive bias' for the most part.
__________________
the sun's not yellow, it's chicken
Pow R. Toc H. is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 10:06 PM   #517 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pow R. Toc H. View Post
you don't have to post to observe.




You seem to be on the firing end of the 'obsessive bias' for the most part.
Um, ok. I was kinda expecting that: if all else fails, just accuse other person of something randomly without explaining how or why or what that means. Good one!
Rainard Jalen is offline  
Old 07-09-2008, 10:35 PM   #518 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Pow R. Toc H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38
Default

I'd rather do that than waste time posting a lengthy response to someone who has no substantial relevance in my life.

but you can keep firing the lectures at me, it you want.
__________________
the sun's not yellow, it's chicken
Pow R. Toc H. is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:21 AM   #519 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pow R. Toc H. View Post
I'd rather do that than waste time posting a lengthy response to someone who has no substantial relevance in my life.
lmao, so what the hell are you doing on an *internet* discussions board, particularly one that is explicitly titled "music banter"?

If you don't want to have a discussion, that's fine with me. Just don't post insults or accusations that you refuse to back up.
Rainard Jalen is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 09:02 AM   #520 (permalink)
Way Out There
 
almauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
This isn't true at all. The Stones' best albums are pretty much great through and through. Go listen to Aftermath, same year as Revolver.
Aftermath would even had been better if the Stones record company hadn't subverted it by marketing it's singles in different markets. For instance Aftermath has a UK and US version, with "Mothers Little Helper" in the UK, and "Paint in Black" in the US, but neither songs are on both. Absolutely ridiculous considering they could have easily dropped one of the lesser tracks. So all you folks talking about "filler" on their earlier albums, have to realize London records was in large part to blame.
__________________
rock n music blog
almauro is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.