The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (bass, hardcore, single, genre) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2008, 12:36 PM   #541 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

I don't think you get my point.

Sure this is a Beatles vs Stones thread but what bearing does The Beatles have on the quality of Stones records?

If you say the Stones have not made a good record for 36 years if I point out that they have I don't need to base how good they are on Beatles records.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline  
Old 08-18-2008, 12:59 PM   #542 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

But that wasn't within the context of my comment. You might be saying that they released something you would call "good" since then, and that's fair and well, but it doesn't really address what I was saying. I meant that in comparison to both the Stones' own earlier records and the Beatles' records, the Stones haven't released anything that compares favorably since 1972. Nothing they did after that could match up to Let It Bleed, Aftermath, Beggars Banquet, Sticky Fingers, etc. This was to support the fact that although they've been a band six times longer than the Beatles, they haven't had a comparatively good record in thirty-six years.

i.e. their longevity shouldn't be a factor.
__________________
first.am

Last edited by lucifer_sam; 08-18-2008 at 11:22 PM.
lucifer_sam is offline  
Old 08-25-2008, 04:34 PM   #543 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 21
Default

uummm, Beatles!
I just like there sound WAY better...
I dont even like The Rolling Stones!
__________________
<3 Pretty Rave Girl
prettyravegirl is offline  
Old 09-01-2008, 08:26 AM   #544 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Folkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, On
Posts: 33
Default

I'd pick the beatles becasue they have defined generations. Although i like theyre later work as apose to their earlier
Folkie is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 07:53 AM   #545 (permalink)
Groupie
 
sweetleaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Never never land
Posts: 39
Default

This is the greatest poll ever... I used to ask people this question... then I decided I didn't want to fight any more, haha
Don't kill me I said The Beatles and no that doesn't mean that I don't love and appreciate The Rolling Stones.
sweetleaf is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 05:28 PM   #546 (permalink)
The Stain Specialist
 
WeeLittleHobbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetleaf View Post
This is the greatest poll ever... I used to ask people this question... then I decided I didn't want to fight any more, haha
Don't kill me I said The Beatles and no that doesn't mean that I don't love and appreciate The Rolling Stones.

Exactly. Stones are great, but Beatles are in a different realm entirely.
__________________
Tommy: I'm funny how? Funny like a clown? I amuse you? I'm here to f*cking amuse you? What do you mean, funny? How am I funny?
Henry: You know, how you tell a story.
Tommy: I don't know. You said it. You said I'm funny. How am I funny?
WeeLittleHobbit is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 07:31 PM   #547 (permalink)
Way Out There
 
almauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
.... the Stones haven't released anything that compares favorably since 1972. Nothing they did after that could match up to Let It Bleed, Aftermath, Beggars Banquet, Sticky Fingers, etc.
i.e. their longevity shouldn't be a factor.
ahhh... Some Girls...duh.
__________________
rock n music blog
almauro is offline  
Old 09-07-2008, 09:54 AM   #548 (permalink)
ddp
Music Addict
 
ddp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeLittleHobbit View Post
Exactly. Stones are great, but Beatles are in a different realm entirely.
Yup. Nuff said.
ddp is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 10:58 PM   #549 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
5-Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Echo Park, Earth
Posts: 197
Default

I end up listening to certain Stones records a lot more, and their influences are ultimately more in line with my own... Plus Keith is one of my three or four favorite guitar players, no matter what he's playing. The new movie (Shine A Light) is terrific with the exception of Jack White who, IMHO, should be embalmed alive and his ashes scattered in a Wal-Mart. (Well, really I can't wish him that much harm as a human being, just as an icon. As a human being I wish he would give it all up and become a retail wonk at a local natural food store in, say, Topeka)... Darryl Jones is the bass player Charlie and Keith have been needing for, what, 127 years now? Great band, even if their songwriting has been about crap since Goat's Head Soup (which I liked, and certain tunes since, but generally that was the last reasonable blast, again IMHO)

Favorites include "Let It Bleed," "Black And Blue," "Exile On Main Street," others...

OK, so Beatles... "White Album" is something I come back to again and again, likewise bits of "Let It Be" and "Abbey Road" and certain other tunes and bits. There's a vibe there that can be found nowhere else. It is important (to me) to drink it in from time to time.

I do listen to early Stones records - less now than I used to, but there's something about them that I like. Early Beatles has held up for me less well.

So - Stones overall, but Beatles very important for what they were/are.
__________________
music for your life:
http://www.5-Track.com/NeptuneResearch
5-Track is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 11:27 PM   #550 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: high above the Republic of Texas
Posts: 216
Cool

beatles

their music is able to span genres seamlessly

they were way ahead of their time

they managed to stay away from heroin

their experimental music has inspired many genres

and the stones are some SKANKY looking and acting dudes

even though i haven't read all of the posts
i'm willing to bet this isn't the first time that was said!
Fyrenza is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.