The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, country, hardcore, jazz)

FireInCairo · 10-08-2008, 01:00 AM

moptops and matching suits....Epstein's idea

Berringer · 10-08-2008, 01:31 AM

I'm a much bigger fan of the Rolling Stones than I am the Beatles. Even though I love a lot of their work, the Fab Four are a bit overrated for my taste. The Stones have a darker appeal in some respects as well, and I always find that intriguing.

Rainard Jalen · 10-08-2008, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Berringer

the Fab Four are a bit overrated for my taste.

um, what does that actually mean?

FireInCairo · 10-08-2008, 01:35 AM

yeah...they are overrated no doubt....but that doesnt make them bad in itself

i smell a hipster... haha

Zarko · 10-08-2008, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen

um, what does that actually mean?

For what Berringer likes, they aren't quite as good as made out to be.

In other terms he doesn't rate them too highly because he doesn't like em as much.

Berringer · 10-08-2008, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zarko

For what Berringer likes, they aren't quite as good as made out to be.

That's one way to say it.

Zarko · 10-08-2008, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Berringer

That's one way to say it.

lol is the other way "Based on what I like, they make poor and unappealing music"

The Monkey · 10-08-2008, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double X

My favorite is easily 'You Can't Always Get What You Want'...and I am probably not a hardcore fan because I love all their popular singles: Gimme Shelter, Satisfaction, Paint It Black, etc. They a had a bunch.

Gimme Shelter wasn't a single.

But yes, I agree, most of their non-single albums tracks are very boring. In fact I find Stones albums quite dull, a single compilation is really all you need (along with the above mentioned song).

Berringer · 10-08-2008, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zarko

lol is the other way "Based on what I like, they make poor and unappealing music"

No, not really. I've got almost all of their albums in my collection. I just feel they're given far too much credit when it comes to being originators of certain styles. In my life, I have actually heard people give credit to the Beatles for producing the first concept album ("Sgt. Pepper's"), the first heavy metal single ("Helter Skelter") and numerous other laughable accolades that have been attached to them simply because of their popularity. Their music was indeed great, but by no means were they the progenitors of even half of what they're ackowledged for.

The Monkey · 10-08-2008, 06:37 PM

Why are you writing your text in blue?

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones	1,000,000,059	99.90%
Beatles	1,000,073	0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

10-08-2008, 01:00 AM	#561 (permalink)
FireInCairo Later on... Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Melbourne Posts: 1,235	moptops and matching suits....Epstein's idea __________________ O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.

10-08-2008, 01:35 AM	#564 (permalink)
FireInCairo Later on... Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Melbourne Posts: 1,235	yeah...they are overrated no doubt....but that doesnt make them bad in itself i smell a hipster... haha __________________ O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires. Last edited by FireInCairo; 10-08-2008 at 01:35 AM. Reason: missed a bit

10-08-2008, 06:37 PM	#570 (permalink)
The Monkey Music Addict Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sweden Posts: 803	Why are you writing your text in blue? __________________ Now another stranger seems to want you to ignore his dreams as though they were the burden of some other My Last.fm

10-08-2008, 01:31 AM	#562 (permalink)
Berringer Groupie Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Psychedelic Underground Posts: 37	I'm a much bigger fan of the Rolling Stones than I am the Beatles. Even though I love a lot of their work, the Fab Four are a bit overrated for my taste. The Stones have a darker appeal in some respects as well, and I always find that intriguing.